지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Understanding the Qur’an has been a challenging task for many readers of this ancient text. While the traditional method of interpreting the Qur’an has heavily relied in classical commentaries from the early years of Islamic history, the early commentators used many traditions (riwayāt) with great authority simply because these traditions were believed to have been transmitted from Muhammad or his companions or even the disciples of the companions. However, modern exegetical methodologies of the Qur’an poised new perspectives and challenges to this way of interpreting the Qur’an.
This paper attempts to provide a critical analysis of the Qur’anic exegetical process by using Q 105(Surat al-Fīl) as a case. While this short Sūrah is consisted of simple five verses, the major interpretive keys come not from the contents of the Qur’anic text, but from the historical information in various traditions that seem to be either conflicting or irreconcilable in some cases, or contain mythical or legendary elements. The circumstantial contexts of this Sūrah by Muhammad are also unidentifiable that it is very uncertain what the purpose of this Sūrah was in the original context of the early Islamic community. Several words in this short text carry uncertainty which exemplifies the difficulty of interpreting the Qur’anic text from a linguisticpoint of view. Even a significant amount of disagreements inthe interpretation of this Sūrah appears in the representative Sunni commentaries that are reviewed in this study.
This paper demonstrates the various problems or challenging tasks in the exegetical process of the Qur’an when one follows an objective exegetical method that is accepted by most of the interpreters, both Muslims and non-Muslims. While interpreting the Qur’anic text is a challenging task, a significant progress can be accomplished when one applies a proper exegetical process in order to find what was the intended meaning of specific passage to the original audience in the original historical context. It is hoped that there will be further development in the studies of exegetical methods of the Qur’an beyond the traditional understanding of the Qur’an for the purpose of a better illumination of the meanings of the Qur’anic texts in understandable and relevant ways.
This paper attempts to provide a critical analysis of the Qur’anic exegetical process by using Q 105(Surat al-Fīl) as a case. While this short Sūrah is consisted of simple five verses, the major interpretive keys come not from the contents of the Qur’anic text, but from the historical information in various traditions that seem to be either conflicting or irreconcilable in some cases, or contain mythical or legendary elements. The circumstantial contexts of this Sūrah by Muhammad are also unidentifiable that it is very uncertain what the purpose of this Sūrah was in the original context of the early Islamic community. Several words in this short text carry uncertainty which exemplifies the difficulty of interpreting the Qur’anic text from a linguisticpoint of view. Even a significant amount of disagreements inthe interpretation of this Sūrah appears in the representative Sunni commentaries that are reviewed in this study.
This paper demonstrates the various problems or challenging tasks in the exegetical process of the Qur’an when one follows an objective exegetical method that is accepted by most of the interpreters, both Muslims and non-Muslims. While interpreting the Qur’anic text is a challenging task, a significant progress can be accomplished when one applies a proper exegetical process in order to find what was the intended meaning of specific passage to the original audience in the original historical context. It is hoped that there will be further development in the studies of exegetical methods of the Qur’an beyond the traditional understanding of the Qur’an for the purpose of a better illumination of the meanings of the Qur’anic texts in understandable and relevant ways.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 꾸란 105장 본문 번역들과 언어적 분석
Ⅲ. 꾸란 105장의 본문 주해(Exegesis)
Ⅳ. 꾸란 본문 주해 과정에서 나타나는 난제들에 대한 비평적 분석
Ⅵ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
복음 전도자의 코란에 대한 올바른 해석학적 태도와 활용법에 대한 제안 : 코란의 ‘이싸’를 접촉점으로 한 두 가지 복음 증거법의 비교를 통하여
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2015 .12
-
현대 꾸란학의 서구 학계 동향과 선교학적 시사점
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
꾸란의 카타바(Kataba) 의미의 다양성 연구
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
꾸란 4:157에 나타난 이싸의 십자가 죽음에 관한 순니 주석가들의 해석에 대한 비평적 고찰
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
꾸란의 피조성에 관한 이슬람 철학의 논쟁에 관한 연구
동서철학연구
2017 .01
-
‘유대인도 아니고 그리스도인도 아닌’ 초기 꾸란 공동체의 정체성 형성에 관한 연구
Canon&Culture
2019 .10
-
The CAMEL Method’s Not So New Perspective on the Qur’an
Hapshin Theological Review
2016 .12
-
꾸란 해석의 다양성에 대한 이해
Canon&Culture
2019 .10
-
Arthur Jeffrey, The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’an. Texts and Studies on the Qur’an Series 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2007. 311pp. 29.95 Euro.
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2022 .12
-
꾸란 주석의 형성과 의미 번역
ACTS 신학저널
2019 .01
-
꾸란 의미의 다층성과 이슬람의 전개
원불교사상과종교문화
2016 .09
-
Abrogation in the text of the Qur’ān-Claims and Counterclaims: A Christian Response
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2015 .08
-
Corrections in Early Qur’anic Manuscripts: Twenty Examples. By Daniel Alan Brubaker. Lovettsville: Think and Tell Press, 2019. xxv + 102 pages. ISBN 978-1-949123-03-6. Price: $35 (paperback).
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
쿠란의 신성화와 정전화 과정을 둘러싼 논쟁 고찰
한국사상사학
2017 .01
-
Does the NT Quotation of Non-Canonical Sources Validate the Use of the Qur’ān in Christian Witness to Muslims?
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2015 .08
-
Textual Encounters’: The Sabians in Qur’aˉnic Exegesis
인문논총
2018 .01
-
무함마드가 만난 그리스도인들
ACTS 신학저널
2015 .01
-
SAUL, DAVID, AND GOLIATH IN THE QURʾĀN (Q 2:246-251): READIN G TAʾRĪKH AL-ṬABARĪWIT H AL-THAʿLABĪ AND AL-QURṬUBĪ
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2021 .09
-
꾸란의 ‘지하드’(Dschihād)의 독일어번역, 그리고 지하드와 연관된 꾸란의 사상
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
[서평] Mark Durie, The Qur’an and its Biblical Reflexes: Investigations into the Genesis of a Religion (Lanham, Lexington Books, 2018), 335 pages.
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
왜곡된 근대화의 산물로서의 이슬람근본주의
엄한진
종교연구
2002
.12
이슬람 근본주의자들에 맞서는 무슬림 여성주의자들의 실천 전략 : 말레이시아의 Sisters In Islam 활동가들을 중심으로
이수인
한국여성학
2014
.03
꾸란의 해석을 통한 이슬람 과격단체 전문가 양성방안
김효준
,
이선제
,
현석환
한국사회안전학회지
2013
.05
중앙아시아의 이슬람 원리주의와 사회운동 : 타지키스탄의 해방당(解放黨)을 중심으로
이채문
사회과학 담론과 정책
2009
.10
이슬람법질서의 공법적 구조분석 : 샤리아법과 헌법 그리고 국가조직법
박규환
공법학연구
2009
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-918-000046370