지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 141 - 180 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.30532/mce.2015.12.8.2.141
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I have considered a critical study of Muslim evangelism of using the Qur’an, which has always been an issue in Muslim evangelism, and today, has specially gained a heightened interest through ‘Camel Mehtod’. Because, in this evangelism method, some important issues which can not be ignored and overlooked for pragmatic purpose, are involved. So for finding the direction of Christian’s proper attitude for using the Qur’an for the purpose of Muslim evangelism I have undertaken a critical study of the evangelism methods which use the Qur’anic ‘Isa’ as a contact point.
These methods can be classified into two types, according to the hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’an. The first one is to try to prove the Gospel in the Qur’an through the Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic of Isa. And the second is to share the Gospel based on the differences between Isa and Jesus which are discerned by interpreting the Qur’an’s Isa in terms of its own point of view, and based on the Bible. In this paper, I compared each cases of these two methods, and studied what hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’an the evangelists have taken, and how they use the Qur’anic base for the evangelism.
And I examined that the first evangelism method of the Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic of Isa has a theological, hermeneutical, and relational problems. The first theological problem is the conflict of Scriptural versus Qur’anic authority in the mind of a Christian who is converted from a Muslim background. The second theological problem is the hermeneutical error which uses some biblical texts as the basis for a Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic. The third theological problem is to overlook the Qur’anic effect which distorts Christian truth and exchanges it for a lie. By means of its worldview and its incorrect biblical statements, the Qur’an systematically suppresses biblical truth. And In relation to the hermeneutical problem, this Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic interprets the text according to the interpreter’s premise, and thus ignores the Qur’anic context and its worldview. Consequently, this causes a relational problem with Muslims because it is a misuse of the Qur’an.
These problems disproves that the proper hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’anic Isa which the evangelist should take is to interpret it in the context of the Qur’an. So for a right evangelism method using the Qur’anic Isa as contact point, I suggested sharing the Gospel, based on the differences between Isa and Jesus which are figured out from this hermeneutical attitude, and based on the Bible. Therefore in this method, Isa can not be used as a theological starting point to prove the Christian Gospel, but as a communicational starting point which enables Muslims to hear the sound testimony of the Bible.
In conclusion, this evangelism method suggests a direction for the Christian’s approach to and use of the Qur’an. That is, Qur’an cannot be a theological starting point for proving the Gospel. We should honestly interpret the Qur’an by observing the standard hermeneutical rules, and thus recognize the Qur’an’s apparent and real differences with the Bible. Our testimony should not be grounded on the Qur’an but on the Bible.
These methods can be classified into two types, according to the hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’an. The first one is to try to prove the Gospel in the Qur’an through the Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic of Isa. And the second is to share the Gospel based on the differences between Isa and Jesus which are discerned by interpreting the Qur’an’s Isa in terms of its own point of view, and based on the Bible. In this paper, I compared each cases of these two methods, and studied what hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’an the evangelists have taken, and how they use the Qur’anic base for the evangelism.
And I examined that the first evangelism method of the Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic of Isa has a theological, hermeneutical, and relational problems. The first theological problem is the conflict of Scriptural versus Qur’anic authority in the mind of a Christian who is converted from a Muslim background. The second theological problem is the hermeneutical error which uses some biblical texts as the basis for a Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic. The third theological problem is to overlook the Qur’anic effect which distorts Christian truth and exchanges it for a lie. By means of its worldview and its incorrect biblical statements, the Qur’an systematically suppresses biblical truth. And In relation to the hermeneutical problem, this Christian Qur’anic hermeneutic interprets the text according to the interpreter’s premise, and thus ignores the Qur’anic context and its worldview. Consequently, this causes a relational problem with Muslims because it is a misuse of the Qur’an.
These problems disproves that the proper hermeneutical attitude to the Qur’anic Isa which the evangelist should take is to interpret it in the context of the Qur’an. So for a right evangelism method using the Qur’anic Isa as contact point, I suggested sharing the Gospel, based on the differences between Isa and Jesus which are figured out from this hermeneutical attitude, and based on the Bible. Therefore in this method, Isa can not be used as a theological starting point to prove the Christian Gospel, but as a communicational starting point which enables Muslims to hear the sound testimony of the Bible.
In conclusion, this evangelism method suggests a direction for the Christian’s approach to and use of the Qur’an. That is, Qur’an cannot be a theological starting point for proving the Gospel. We should honestly interpret the Qur’an by observing the standard hermeneutical rules, and thus recognize the Qur’an’s apparent and real differences with the Bible. Our testimony should not be grounded on the Qur’an but on the Bible.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 증거법 1: 코란의 ‘이싸’ 에 대한 기독교적 해석을 통한 복음 증거
Ⅲ. 증거법 2: 코란의 ‘이싸’와 성경의 ‘예수’의 차별성에 기초한 증거
Ⅳ. 증거법 1 에 대한 비판과 증거법 2 제안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
꾸란 105장의 주석을 통해 본 꾸란 해석 과정에 대한 비평적 분석
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2020 .12
-
현대 꾸란학의 서구 학계 동향과 선교학적 시사점
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
꾸란 4:157에 나타난 이싸의 십자가 죽음에 관한 순니 주석가들의 해석에 대한 비평적 고찰
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
꾸란의 카타바(Kataba) 의미의 다양성 연구
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
The CAMEL Method’s Not So New Perspective on the Qur’an
Hapshin Theological Review
2016 .12
-
Arthur Jeffrey, The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’an. Texts and Studies on the Qur’an Series 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2007. 311pp. 29.95 Euro.
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2022 .12
-
꾸란의 피조성에 관한 이슬람 철학의 논쟁에 관한 연구
동서철학연구
2017 .01
-
‘유대인도 아니고 그리스도인도 아닌’ 초기 꾸란 공동체의 정체성 형성에 관한 연구
Canon&Culture
2019 .10
-
Corrections in Early Qur’anic Manuscripts: Twenty Examples. By Daniel Alan Brubaker. Lovettsville: Think and Tell Press, 2019. xxv + 102 pages. ISBN 978-1-949123-03-6. Price: $35 (paperback).
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2021 .12
-
쿠란의 신성화와 정전화 과정을 둘러싼 논쟁 고찰
한국사상사학
2017 .01
-
무함마드가 만난 그리스도인들
ACTS 신학저널
2015 .01
-
꾸란 의미의 다층성과 이슬람의 전개
원불교사상과종교문화
2016 .09
-
Abrogation in the text of the Qur’ān-Claims and Counterclaims: A Christian Response
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2015 .08
-
꾸란 해석의 다양성에 대한 이해
Canon&Culture
2019 .10
-
Does the NT Quotation of Non-Canonical Sources Validate the Use of the Qur’ān in Christian Witness to Muslims?
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2015 .08
-
[서평] Mark Durie, The Qur’an and its Biblical Reflexes: Investigations into the Genesis of a Religion (Lanham, Lexington Books, 2018), 335 pages.
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
코란과 하디스에 나타난 환경원칙과 물(수자원)의 의미
아랍어와 아랍문학
2018 .01
-
꾸란의 자히르는 성경의 literal 의미인가?
아랍과 이슬람 세계
2019 .12
-
John Calvin"s views of "the Turks" and of Finding Truth in Non-Biblical Sacred Texts
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
꾸란 주석의 형성과 의미 번역
ACTS 신학저널
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-280-000871586