메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이미남 (안산대학교) 정윤희 (상지대학교) 이해영 (상지대학교)
저널정보
한국외식산업학회 한국외식산업학회지 한국외식산업학회지 제16권 제2호(통권 제47호)
발행연도
2020.6
수록면
121 - 131 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to present theoretical-practical information for the vitalization of the food insect industry by identifying consumer awareness and selection attributes of edible insects according to the health concern level of edible insects, which are high-protein and widely known as eco-friendly foods. Subjects to the survey were male and female consumers in their 20s and under 70s nationwide, using structured questionnaires. Data from 412 respondents were used for analysis. The results were as follows: First, the results of a survey on perception levels of edible insects according to levels of health concerns showed that both ‘higher health concerns’ group and ‘lower health concerns’ group perceived edible insects as ‘edible insect menus and edible insect products are protein-rich foods(3.85 and 3.43 points, respectively; p<0.001) and ’edible insects are future alternative foods’(3.79 and 3.23 points, respectively; p<0.001). Second, according to the survey on the selection attributes when purchasing edible insect products, Selection attributes of ‘higher health concerns’ group was in the order of stability (4.67 points), hygiene (4.61 points), and health functional (4.25 points), while those of ‘lower health concerns’ group was in the order of hygiene (4.49 points), food stability (4.44 points) and sensual factors (4.11 points). When purchasing edible insect food, there were statistically significant differences between survey groups according to health concerns in all selection attributes, except for sensual factors and hygiene(p<0.01, p<0.001). At a time when a lot of researches is being conducted on edible insects, I think this article will contribute to popularizing them as a paper that has examined the perception of them according to the level of health concern.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 연구방법
IV. 연구결과 및 고찰
IV. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-324-000865653