지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제116호
- 발행연도
- 2020.6
- 수록면
- 249 - 289 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.06.116.249
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Generally, it was often understood that the title of “Gongju(公主)” in history of Korea is the one assigned at the time of princesses’ birth. Due to this phenomenon, the character and change of the title of “Gongju” has never been considered as a research topic. However, the title of “Gongju” was actually originated from China, and Goryeo adopted and developed this title under its political and social needs. Under this circumstance of lacking consideration about the “Gongju”, this study tries to scrutinize the installation system of the “Gongju” in the Early period of Goryeo dynasty.
Since the early days of the dynasty, the Goryeo royal family and the government used the title ‘Princess,’ following Shilla practices. Daughters of the kings since the day of founder King Taejo(太祖) through the reign of King Seongjong(成宗) were called as “Gongju”. But it was used as simple designation of King’s Daughter.
Then during the reign of King Hyeonjong(顯宗), the first ever case of the King’s daughter being ‘entitled as(冊封)’ a “Gongju” figure in Korean history occurred. This case allows us to assume that it was only then when the official institution of entitling Gongju figures was initiated, and that the status of “Gongju” turned into not a hereditary one but an entitled one. Further analysis –on the all of King’sDaughter in the Goryeo period’s early half- based on this hypothesis reveals that since the reign of King Hyeonjong only the Kings’daughters whose mothers were above the status of commoners, and then later, since the reign of King Seonjong(宣宗) only daughters of the first wife or other wives granted with such status were entitled as “Gongju”. This was a practice clearly different from its Chinese counterpart where all daughters of the Emperors were acknowledged as “Gongju”.
Goryeo observed the Ritual of Entitling Wangja and Wanghi Figures(冊王子王姬儀). While the Chinese version was related to the Emperor’s daughter’s marriage, and was an institution providing bongho(封號) with the title of “Gongju”, the Goryeo version had nothing to do with marital arrangements, and was an institution providing bongho with the Gongju identity itself. So, just like the ritual through which a King’s son could receive the noble title of Gong(公) or Hu(侯), the “Gongju” was also a noble title selectively given to certain daughters of the King.
As we can see, Goryeo imported the “Gongju” title and the installation system from China, but operated the system very differently. It may have been due to the fact that while China was a patriarchal society where the consciousness of ‘shared essence’ was strong, Goryeo had a bilateral kinship system. During the reign of King Hyeonjong, it became necessary to rank the King’s daughters, so the Gongju installation system was embraced, and as it was needed to differentiate some daughters of the King from the others, the status of their mothers were used as a foundation to selectively apply the “Gongju” title to them, as such new identity would positively differentiate the recipients of such identity from those who did not receive it. Later, since King Seonjong’s reign, the required status of the mother was even heightened due to several factors such as political necessity, reforms in ritual protocols, and advances in Confucian expertise.
It is clear that the status of “Gongju” in Goryeo was to which only a few among others could rise.
Since the early days of the dynasty, the Goryeo royal family and the government used the title ‘Princess,’ following Shilla practices. Daughters of the kings since the day of founder King Taejo(太祖) through the reign of King Seongjong(成宗) were called as “Gongju”. But it was used as simple designation of King’s Daughter.
Then during the reign of King Hyeonjong(顯宗), the first ever case of the King’s daughter being ‘entitled as(冊封)’ a “Gongju” figure in Korean history occurred. This case allows us to assume that it was only then when the official institution of entitling Gongju figures was initiated, and that the status of “Gongju” turned into not a hereditary one but an entitled one. Further analysis –on the all of King’sDaughter in the Goryeo period’s early half- based on this hypothesis reveals that since the reign of King Hyeonjong only the Kings’daughters whose mothers were above the status of commoners, and then later, since the reign of King Seonjong(宣宗) only daughters of the first wife or other wives granted with such status were entitled as “Gongju”. This was a practice clearly different from its Chinese counterpart where all daughters of the Emperors were acknowledged as “Gongju”.
Goryeo observed the Ritual of Entitling Wangja and Wanghi Figures(冊王子王姬儀). While the Chinese version was related to the Emperor’s daughter’s marriage, and was an institution providing bongho(封號) with the title of “Gongju”, the Goryeo version had nothing to do with marital arrangements, and was an institution providing bongho with the Gongju identity itself. So, just like the ritual through which a King’s son could receive the noble title of Gong(公) or Hu(侯), the “Gongju” was also a noble title selectively given to certain daughters of the King.
As we can see, Goryeo imported the “Gongju” title and the installation system from China, but operated the system very differently. It may have been due to the fact that while China was a patriarchal society where the consciousness of ‘shared essence’ was strong, Goryeo had a bilateral kinship system. During the reign of King Hyeonjong, it became necessary to rank the King’s daughters, so the Gongju installation system was embraced, and as it was needed to differentiate some daughters of the King from the others, the status of their mothers were used as a foundation to selectively apply the “Gongju” title to them, as such new identity would positively differentiate the recipients of such identity from those who did not receive it. Later, since King Seonjong’s reign, the required status of the mother was even heightened due to several factors such as political necessity, reforms in ritual protocols, and advances in Confucian expertise.
It is clear that the status of “Gongju” in Goryeo was to which only a few among others could rise.
목차
머리말
1. 현종대 공주 책봉제의 시행과 정착
2. 선종 이후 공주 책봉 대상자의 변화
3. 고려 전기 공주 책봉제의 특징
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
공주지역 교육도시 도약의 시대와 사회적 요인 분석 -미군정기 교원양성과 사범대학 설립 운동을 중심으로-
역사와 담론
2021 .10
-
공주선교기지의 성립과 변화 및 선교유적의 형성과정 연구
한국교회사학회지
2023 .05
-
초기 천주교회사와 공주
역사와 담론
2015 .01
-
公山城 출토 칠피갑옷 銘文資料의 재검토
목간과문자
2019 .06
-
곰나루 설화와 백제의 곰 신앙
유라시아문화
2022 .02
-
徐居正의 公州十景 漢詩 考察 -공주의융복합적지역문화탐색을중심으로-
漢文古典硏究
2019 .01
-
충남 공주 지역의 음악 전통과 중고제 판소리
동아시아고대학
2019 .01
-
공주 마곡사 오층석탑 금동보탑 연구
백제문화
2015 .02
-
공주 송산리 고분군 활용방안 연구- 전시시설물을 중심으로 -
백제학보
2018 .01
-
고려 태조의 訓要 8조에 대한 재검토
도서문화
2018 .12
-
금강 선유 한시 연구
漢文古典硏究
2019 .01
-
해방직후 고려 국호론의 전개와 고려 표상
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
時間을 加工하다 ― 西北漢簡을 통해 본 漢代 年號 改元과 문서 행정의 관계 ―
중국고중세사연구
2023 .02
-
조선후기 忠淸道 公州牧의 有力 姓氏와 향촌 지배세력의 추이 - 『鄕案』,『居接名錄』의 분석을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2019 .10
-
어머니 부재가 딸에게 끼친 영향: 구약의 딸에 대한 어머니 역할 연구
구약논단
2023 .06
-
雪蕉 崔承太의 공주체류기 漢詩 고찰
漢文古典硏究
2019 .01
-
구비설화에 나타난 시집간 딸의 역할과 부녀관계의 의미
국학연구론총
2023 .06
-
13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식과 정체성
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
불효녀 설화에 나타난 가산(家産)의 의미와 가족윤리 연구
이화어문논집
2019 .01
-
조선 전기 ‘딸에서 며느리로’ 정체성 변화와 재산권 – 경주 양동마을을 중심으로 –
여성과역사
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000839474