지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제115호
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 125 - 158 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.03.115.125
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After a century of military commanders’ control of the government, the king’s governance was resumed in the 13th century, yet the Goryeo court was still under heavy influence of all the interventions committed by the Mongol Yuan empire. The Goryeo intellectuals of the time had to reevaluate their own identity and the nature of the Goryeo society itself. Some historians took notice of this particular aspect of the time fairly early on, and examined certain changes in the Goryeo people’s world view, perspective on their own dynasty as well as themselves, which were undoubtedly caused by the new relationship Goryeo was forced to cultivate with Yuan. However, one thing was missing from the discussion: the fact that the Goryeo intellectuals of the time were defining their own reality not only as a contemporary one but also as an era that was completely different and severed from the past. So, examined in this article is the Goryeo people’s new take on the ‘now,’ and what kind of identity they were pursuing and exploring for themselves.
In the eyes of the Goryeo intellectuals of the time, the very foundation of the Goryeo dynasty, which had only continued to prosper ever since Founder king Taejo Wang Geon opened the country, was severely shaken and even nearly dismantled by the Military commanders’ revolt during King Euijong’s reign, and the whole Goryeo civilization was summarily broken as a result. That was their take on the ‘past.’ And compared to such ‘past,’ at least in their eyes, the 13th and 14th centuries, a time when Goryeo was situated within the Yuan-centric world order, was an era that welcomed civil governance, duly supported by worthy human resources appointed to proper tasks, under the leadership of the Imperial Yuan court. So, to the Goryeo intellectuals, the ‘present’ was an era of a civilized world order, which they had no reservation to immediately join as well. Added to that, based on the new academic school of thought –Neo-Confucianism- they recently learned from the very heart of the above-said civilization, they viewed themselves as a generation tasked with the duty and obligation to ‘resurrect’ the long forgotten civilized traditions of Goryeo.
Meanwhile, the intellectuals’ experience of the so-called Jung’hwa, the conceptual Sino-centric world order and culture, was quite different from what the former generations earlier had, in terms of not only quantity but quality as well. Although overwhelmed by the Yuan empire’s superior political and cultural influences and therefore acknowledging its merits as qualities they had to embody as well, the Goryeo intellectuals of the time also identified themselves as the “People of the East(Dong’in, 東人)” who had maintained a cultural distinctiveness and outstanding capabilities of their own for a very long time. Their evaluation of the present and themselves in such climate laid down a new foundation upon which future generations would continue to charter new realities for themselves.
In the eyes of the Goryeo intellectuals of the time, the very foundation of the Goryeo dynasty, which had only continued to prosper ever since Founder king Taejo Wang Geon opened the country, was severely shaken and even nearly dismantled by the Military commanders’ revolt during King Euijong’s reign, and the whole Goryeo civilization was summarily broken as a result. That was their take on the ‘past.’ And compared to such ‘past,’ at least in their eyes, the 13th and 14th centuries, a time when Goryeo was situated within the Yuan-centric world order, was an era that welcomed civil governance, duly supported by worthy human resources appointed to proper tasks, under the leadership of the Imperial Yuan court. So, to the Goryeo intellectuals, the ‘present’ was an era of a civilized world order, which they had no reservation to immediately join as well. Added to that, based on the new academic school of thought –Neo-Confucianism- they recently learned from the very heart of the above-said civilization, they viewed themselves as a generation tasked with the duty and obligation to ‘resurrect’ the long forgotten civilized traditions of Goryeo.
Meanwhile, the intellectuals’ experience of the so-called Jung’hwa, the conceptual Sino-centric world order and culture, was quite different from what the former generations earlier had, in terms of not only quantity but quality as well. Although overwhelmed by the Yuan empire’s superior political and cultural influences and therefore acknowledging its merits as qualities they had to embody as well, the Goryeo intellectuals of the time also identified themselves as the “People of the East(Dong’in, 東人)” who had maintained a cultural distinctiveness and outstanding capabilities of their own for a very long time. Their evaluation of the present and themselves in such climate laid down a new foundation upon which future generations would continue to charter new realities for themselves.
목차
머리말
1. 13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식
2. 고려 지식인들의 지향과 자기정체성
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Personal Trajectories and National History: Why the Goryeo People Went to the Mongol Empire and How They Lived There
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
고구려인가 기자조선인가: 몽골제국에서 고려 역사상의 경합
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
고려-몽골(원) 관계사 연구를 위한 노력과 종합적 시각의 모색
역사학보
2025 .03
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고려는 어쩌다가 고구려를 계승한 나라로 인식됐을까
역사와현실
2021 .09
-
고려 충선왕의 직물생산 전략 연구
한국사연구
2018 .03
-
한국사에서 13~14세기를 지칭하는 시기 구분 용어의 맥락에 대한 검토
역사학보
2024 .12
-
해방직후 고려 국호론의 전개와 고려 표상
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
가사 不傳 고려가요의 생성연대와 수용양상
우리어문연구
2022 .09
-
고려시대 자기인식의 형성과 문명의식(文明意識)의 변화
동양학
2020 .01
-
고려가 몽골제국에 바라는 것 - 김구(金坵)의 외교문서에 표현된 원종 대 양국관계의 재구성 -
한국사연구
2022 .12
-
『고려사』에 인용된 原典의 句節
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
고려를 찾은 동아시아 고승
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
교과서의 고려시대 대외관계사 쟁점 연구
역사교육
2017 .09
-
Perception of Goryeo Celadon in the Context of the Late Joseon Period
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .06
-
李穀의 『稼亭集』에 수록된 大元帝國 역사 관련 기록 분석
역사학보
2018 .03
-
고려후기 사여관복(賜與冠服) 행례와 예제(禮制) 질서의 형성
역사와현실
2020 .12
-
Remembering Goryeo, a Dynasty that was Open to the Sea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
여말선초 성리학의 수용과 그 성격
역사비평
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000500970