지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제115호
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 241 - 280 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.03.115.241
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To nearby tribute-providing entities, Dongjin(Eastern Jin) bestowed “Inner ranks(內臣官爵)” such as ‘Dodok’ and ‘Jujasa’ in a symbolic gesture, posing as an empire with an emperor. Acknowledgement of kingships for respective kingdoms was frowned upon. Then in 383, when Dongjin’s loss of the Central Plains became evident and permanent after the conclusion of the Bisu(淝水) battle, the Dongjin court began recognizing foreign kings and Northern leaders as kings within their own kingdoms, starting with Baekje in 386. This signifies the Dongjin government’s acknowledgment of the new international situation in which several political entities were indeed entitled to their own kingdoms, and a new policy to pursue an identity as a ‘Jiangnan(江南, under the Yangtze river) State,’ which emerged in China at the end of the Dongjin and early Song period.
To Dongjin, Baekje was an entity separated from the Seojin(Western Jin) realm, as located thousands of Ri units out of the Liaodung region, and a part of an Eastern Barbaric tribe[“東夷, Dong’ih”] called ‘Samhan(三韓).’ Taking advantage of its own regional remoteness, and Dongjin’s limited knowledge of the Korean peninsula’s geography and ethnic nature, Baekje was able to issue certain official communiques designed to propagate its own political and diplomatic agendas. Exploiting Dongjin’s own isolated condition, Baekje unilaterally spreaded a series of diplomatic propaganda, such as “Caring for its own small league of states(‘Gyeom Je-Soguk, 兼諸小國’)” and “Campaigning in the Liaoshi region(‘Ya g’yu Yoseo, 略有遼西’).”
Included in the ‘Gyeom Je-Sogu k’ propaganda was an insinuation of the fact that Baekje was the representative entity of all Samhan in general. This move actually served its purpose as emphasis on that particular notion led to Baekje being recognized in 372 as an independent kingdom for the first time in Dongjin’s history of recognizing foreign entities as such. Meanwhile, the ‘Ya g’yu Yose o’ propaganda signalled the possibility of Baekje mounting military operations beyond the boundaries of Liaodung, the region of ‘Eastern barbarians,’ and in the Liaoshi region which belonged to the Western Jin. This led to Baekje receiving the Dodok title -which had only been allowed to regions and tribes within the Western Jin territory- for the first time as an entity outside such realm. In other words, included in the title of ‘Dodok Baekje Jegunsa(Baekje king, as the Dodok leader of its troops)’ were notions that both viewed Baekje as supposedly under Dongjin’s (nominal) influence and also on its own at the same time.
To Dongjin, Baekje was an entity separated from the Seojin(Western Jin) realm, as located thousands of Ri units out of the Liaodung region, and a part of an Eastern Barbaric tribe[“東夷, Dong’ih”] called ‘Samhan(三韓).’ Taking advantage of its own regional remoteness, and Dongjin’s limited knowledge of the Korean peninsula’s geography and ethnic nature, Baekje was able to issue certain official communiques designed to propagate its own political and diplomatic agendas. Exploiting Dongjin’s own isolated condition, Baekje unilaterally spreaded a series of diplomatic propaganda, such as “Caring for its own small league of states(‘Gyeom Je-Soguk, 兼諸小國’)” and “Campaigning in the Liaoshi region(‘Ya g’yu Yoseo, 略有遼西’).”
Included in the ‘Gyeom Je-Sogu k’ propaganda was an insinuation of the fact that Baekje was the representative entity of all Samhan in general. This move actually served its purpose as emphasis on that particular notion led to Baekje being recognized in 372 as an independent kingdom for the first time in Dongjin’s history of recognizing foreign entities as such. Meanwhile, the ‘Ya g’yu Yose o’ propaganda signalled the possibility of Baekje mounting military operations beyond the boundaries of Liaodung, the region of ‘Eastern barbarians,’ and in the Liaoshi region which belonged to the Western Jin. This led to Baekje receiving the Dodok title -which had only been allowed to regions and tribes within the Western Jin territory- for the first time as an entity outside such realm. In other words, included in the title of ‘Dodok Baekje Jegunsa(Baekje king, as the Dodok leader of its troops)’ were notions that both viewed Baekje as supposedly under Dongjin’s (nominal) influence and also on its own at the same time.
목차
머리말
1. 동진(東晉)의 주변제국 책봉원칙과 백제 인식
2. 백제의 외교정보 전달과 책봉호 수수(收受)
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (53)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
중국학계의 백제사 연구 현황과 전망
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
후백제 주도 세력의 변화와 그 영향
신라사학보
2021 .04
-
666년 신라의 고구려인 ‘府’ 安置와 그 의미
신라사학보
2024 .12
-
웅진기 백제와 왜국의 교류
한국고대사연구
2024 .09
-
4~6세기 백제에서의 중국계 이주민의 정착과 활동
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
일본 속 백제 유물의 범위와 의미
백제문화
2015 .08
-
642년 백제의 정변과 대왜관계에 대한 재검토
사림
2022 .01
-
포스터를 통해 바라본 백제문화제 -최근 10여 년을 중심으로-
人文科學硏究
2023 .02
-
640년대 전반 ‘麗濟連和’의 실상과 唐의 백제 인식
사학연구
2021 .03
-
한성기 백제토기 하한에 대한 비판적 검토
역사학보
2024 .12
-
한국 詠史樂府에 나타난 對百濟史 認識考
漢文古典硏究
2016 .01
-
漢城期 백제의 將軍號 활용 배경과 정치적 의미
백제문화
2015 .02
-
한성시기 백제의 宋･北魏와의 외교 배경과 그 양상
선사와 고대
2017 .01
-
중국 학계의 백제사 연구 동향
동북아역사논총
2018 .06
-
백제계 석탑의 특징과 건립배경
江原史學
2015 .01
-
백제 국가형성사 연구 동향과 과제
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
웅진도독부의 대왜정책 검토
HOMO MIGRANS
2021 .05
-
중국왕조의 ‘百濟略有遼西’ 記事 서술과 인식- 百濟郡 설치를 중심으로 -
백제학보
2018 .01
-
5세기 동아시아에서의 책봉호의 정치적 의미 : 백제 및 남조 주변제국에 수여된 장군호를 중심으로
역사와 세계
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000500945