메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국공법학회 공법연구 공법연구 제32집 제2호
발행연도
2003.12
수록면
459 - 479 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This thesis is to research the meaning of whether the Financial Supervisory Commission(from now on it is cited FSC) is a central administrative agency or not, the quasi-judicial function of an administrative commission and the legal problems concerning to FSC.At first, the meaning of whether FSC is a central administrative agency or not, is whether the first chapter General Part of Government Organization Act applys to FSC or not. Now, Government Organization Act prescribes that except as otherwise provided in this Act or other Acts, the central administrative agencies shall be Bus (Ministries), Cheos (Ministries at the Agencies-Ministerial level) and Cheongs (Administrations at the Vice Ministerial level). But as Government Organization Act prescribes chiefly on Bus (Ministries), Cheos (Ministries at the Agencies-Ministerial level) and Cheongs it is not so meaningful in the respect of an administrative organization law if an organization provided in other Acts is a central administrative agency. And so in order to put many administrative commissions spread in a lot of laws in order and organize a systematic administrative organization law, it is desirable to prescribe an administrative commission as a central administrative agency in Government Organization Act and to prescribe general provisions about it in the General Part of Government Organization Act.Secondly in order to carry out quasi-judicial function, an administrative commission should proceed impeachment and judgement procedure by different officers in taking sanctions against the party to violate the law. The procedure should be reformed so that the taking of evidence and oral proceedings may be conducted under the composition mentioned above.Lastly, from the point of view stated above, FSC has various problems such as weak independence from the government, malfunction of it as a representative system, unclear role assignment and incomplete executive procedures, etc.. It is high time to correct those problems.

목차

AbstractⅠ. 처음에Ⅱ. 금융감독위원회의 법적 성격Ⅲ. 행정위원회의 준사법적 기능Ⅳ. 금융감독위원회를 둘러싼 법적 문제Ⅴ. 맺음말

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-350-000717145