메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
나승균 (충북경찰청) 윤종혁 (연세대학교) 이중정 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국인터넷전자상거래학회 인터넷전자상거래연구 인터넷전자상거래연구 제19권 제4호
발행연도
2019.8
수록면
81 - 98 (18page)
DOI
10.37272/JIECR.2019.08.19.4.81

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Digital analyzes are often treated as conclusive evidence in the field of criminal investigations. In most of the countries, digital evidence has been adopted as crucial evidence in the judgment of the court, and this phenomenon is taking place in South Korea too. In the criminal investigation, police investigators gather digital evidence on site and refer to digital forensics analysts to verify them. The relationship between them plays an important role in criminal investigation. while the role of digital forensics analysts is become more important, a heavy work load of analysts and the dissatisfaction level of investigators are increasingly evident bigger. In this study, we will prioritize factors that enhance the investigator’s satisfaction in the analysis of digital evidence and provide insights for digital forensics analysts to better serve. Using the AHP technique, the priority was derived by organizing the first tier of class and the ten components of each tier of the factor used in the service experience. To verify the validity of each factor, we conducted focus interviews. AHP survey analysis result, in the first tier findings “Reliability” was the most important element, and followed by “Certainty”, “Reactivity”, “Empathy” and “Tangibility”. As the top three of the sub dimensions of 1st tier findings, “tangible technical form”, “contribution of evidence gathering of reactivity”, and “the ability of analysis of reliability” were derived. Based on the results of this study, we expect our finding would contribute to minimize the gap between police investigator’s wish list and digital forensics analysts service in formulating digital evidence.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구분석 및 결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-323-001252249