지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제186집
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 363 - 394 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2019.09.186.363
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Heum’heum Shinseo(欽欽新書) is one of Dasan Jeong Yak-yong(丁若鏞)’s most renowned achievements, along with Gyeongse Yupyo(經世遺表) and Mokmin Shimseo(牧民心書). Heum’heum Shinseo is composed of 30 volumes featuring 5 categories, which include ①three volumes of “Gyeongsa Yo’eui(經史要義, Collection of essential Confucian Court trial protocols cited from classical texts and history books),” ②5 volumes of “Bisang Jeoncho(批詳雋抄, Outstanding reports on murder cases filed by Chinese officials),” ③4 volumes of “Eui’yul Cha’rye(擬律差例, Various cases of legal procedures’ application),” ④15 volumes of “Sang’hyeong Chu’eui(祥刑追議, Criminal cases from King Jeongjo’s era),” and ⑤3 volumes of “Jeonbal Musa(剪跋蕪詞, Case records written by Dasan himself).”
Meanwhile, like Dasan’s other countless writings, exactly how and when Heum’heum Shinseo was compiled and published remains to be clarified. Thus sufficient understanding of the text is still to be achieved as well.
In this article, the compilation process of Heum’heum Shinseo is reexamined, in order to create a comprehensive reference that could benefit future studies of Dasan’s legal philosophy and would also lead to better understanding of Heum’heum Shinseo. First the structure and contents of Heum’heum Shinseo are reviewed, and then the nature of Sang’hyeong-go(祥刑考) -which Dasan consulted in his compilation of Heum’heum Shinseo- as well as a variety of handwritten drafts of Heum’heum Shinseo, is examined here as well. Jeong Yak-yong’s collaboration with his disciples are discussed in this article too.
The above examination of Dasan’s compilation of Heum’heum Shinseo -which was created by a group effort combining his and his students’ expertise like many other Dasan writings- revealed four distinctive phases. The first phase commenced with his beginning of preparation and ended when he completed three volumes of Myeong’cheong-rok(明淸錄) -all during his Gangjin exile- in 1808, without his students’ aid. The second phase seemingly began at the end of phase 1, and culminated with the 1818 completion of the “24-volume version” of Myeong’cheong-rok (the de-facto first draft of Heum’heum Shinseo), which he completed through collaboration with his students. Then the “30-volume version” of Heum’heum Shinseo (which we have today) was completed in 1819 at the end of phase 3, and was supplemented with a formal foreword in 1822, marking the end of phase 4, as well as the final completion of Heum’heum Shinseo.
Meanwhile, like Dasan’s other countless writings, exactly how and when Heum’heum Shinseo was compiled and published remains to be clarified. Thus sufficient understanding of the text is still to be achieved as well.
In this article, the compilation process of Heum’heum Shinseo is reexamined, in order to create a comprehensive reference that could benefit future studies of Dasan’s legal philosophy and would also lead to better understanding of Heum’heum Shinseo. First the structure and contents of Heum’heum Shinseo are reviewed, and then the nature of Sang’hyeong-go(祥刑考) -which Dasan consulted in his compilation of Heum’heum Shinseo- as well as a variety of handwritten drafts of Heum’heum Shinseo, is examined here as well. Jeong Yak-yong’s collaboration with his disciples are discussed in this article too.
The above examination of Dasan’s compilation of Heum’heum Shinseo -which was created by a group effort combining his and his students’ expertise like many other Dasan writings- revealed four distinctive phases. The first phase commenced with his beginning of preparation and ended when he completed three volumes of Myeong’cheong-rok(明淸錄) -all during his Gangjin exile- in 1808, without his students’ aid. The second phase seemingly began at the end of phase 1, and culminated with the 1818 completion of the “24-volume version” of Myeong’cheong-rok (the de-facto first draft of Heum’heum Shinseo), which he completed through collaboration with his students. Then the “30-volume version” of Heum’heum Shinseo (which we have today) was completed in 1819 at the end of phase 3, and was supplemented with a formal foreword in 1822, marking the end of phase 4, as well as the final completion of Heum’heum Shinseo.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 『흠흠신서』의 체재와 『상형고』와의 관계
Ⅲ. 『흠흠신서』 관련 필사본의 분석
Ⅳ. 『흠흠신서』 편찬 과정의 재구성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
심청의 효 및 장애 관념 비판: 동화 <청아, 청아, 눈을 떠라>(2006)와의 비교를 중심으로
한국고전여성문학연구
2023 .06
-
1950~60년대와 ‘명동시절’의 기억 - 구술채록 기반 문예이면사 연구
세계문학비교연구
2024 .09
-
요한복음 21:1-19 다시 읽기 ‐ 예수의 ‘정’(情)을 중심으로
장신논단
2020 .12
-
『靑丘永言』 박순호본, 국립한글박물관 소장 김천택 편 『청구영언』의 선행본일 가능성에 대하여
열상고전연구
2017 .01
-
朱彝尊 前⋅後期詞의 창작 양상 변화 - 明淸 교체기 강남 지식인의 정체성 변화와 관련하여
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .04
-
正祖 經學의 淸代 學說 受用 樣相에 對한 一考察 -『弘齋全書』 『經史講義 書』와 『欽定書經傳說彙纂』의 比較를 中心으로-
고전문학연구
2019 .01
-
김동명 시에 나타난 식물적 상상력 연구
국제한인문학연구
2020 .01
-
김명인 시집 『동두천』에 대한 탈식민주의적 고찰의 가능성
우리어문연구
2017 .01
-
퇴계 이황과 조선시대 성리학자들의 ｢西銘｣ 담론
퇴계학보
2022 .06
-
물명(物名)류의 특징과 자료적 가치
국어사연구
2016 .01
-
이광수의 「무명」과 톨스토이의 「부활」과의 관련성
춘원연구학보
2020 .12
-
『 자산어보』 원편(原編)과 이청의 재편집에 대한 고찰
한국실학연구
2017 .01
-
정관일선(靜觀一禪)의 선시(禪詩) 연구
禪學(선학)
2015 .12
-
1930년대 나만성 "심청전"으로 살펴본 비극 "심청전"의 경계와 위상
철학∙사상∙문화
2019 .01
-
홍경모(洪敬謨)의 조귀명(趙龜命) 산문 수용 양상
국어문학
2023 .11
-
『?聞事說』의 明淸 서적 수용 양상
동양한문학연구
2020 .01
-
익산 지역 천주교 공소학교와 나바위 계명학교
열린정신 인문학연구
2019 .12
-
1960~1970년대 이상론(李箱論)의 향방
구보학보
2019 .01
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
고전문학을 넘어 신화로 회귀하기: 연인 심청에 나타난 종교적 인간
문학과 종교
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-911-001238178