메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국전문물리치료학회 한국전문물리치료학회지 한국전문물리치료학회지 제8권 제1호
발행연도
2001.1
수록면
9 - 19 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
During therapy sessions, feedback is often provided concurrently by the physical therapist as the patient attempts to perform a movement and after the movement attempt. This feedback is provided to enhance the patient's balance abilities. However,recent studies in nondisabled populations have suggested that frequent feedback may be detrimental to retention or learning of motor skills. This study compared the effects of 100% relative frequency of knowledge ofperformance (KP) with 66% relative frequency of KP for motor learning on balanceretraining in patients with hemiplegia. Twenty patients with hemiplegic were randomlyassigned to one of two experimental groups. The acquisition phase consisted of 16blocks of 5 trials for 2 days (80 total practice trials). The retention phase consisted of 2blocks of a short-term retention test, one day after the end of the acquisition phase anda long-term retention test, one week after the end of the short-term retention test. Inthe 100% feedback condition, participants received feedback after every practice trial. Afaded KP schedule was used in the 66% condition. No significant differences were found between the two groups during all experimentalphases (acquisition and retention phases), (p>.05). However, there were significantdecreases in balance index for both groups of acquisition phase (p<.05). These results suggest that 66% relative frequency of KP is not more effective than100% relative frequency of KP with respect to retention over time when hemipareticpatients attempt to learn balance.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0