메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조혁신 (주은라파스병원 재활센터) 정왕모 (정다운병원 물리치료실)
저널정보
대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회 대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회지 대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회지 제9권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
11 - 19 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether it makes difference to use of the Augmented Feedback Type(Verbal Feedback, VTR Feedback and Verbal & VTR Feedback) to hemiplegic adults on learning of motor skill. For the purpose 15 hemiplegic adults who are received rehabilitation program at H hospital in Hong-Sung, Choong-Nam Province. Subjects were classified into three groups by random assignment; the Verbal Feedback group, the VTR Feedback group and Verbal & VTR Feedback group. Each groups received 5 subjects from hemiplegic adults. Subjects were tested by Timed Up and Go test for 9 weeks. And to find out the improvement measured by Pre-Test, Acquisition Test and Retention Test. To find out the improvement of each group's measures took average and standard deviation. To probate the significance of difference between the improvement conducted the one-way ANOVA and to probate the significance of difference of Acquisition Test and Retention test conducted paired t-test. The results of this study were as follows; First, All of Augmented Feedback Types had a positive effect on hemiplegic adults to learning of motor skill. Second, The Verbal Feedback group and the VTR Feedback group had no significantly difference at Acquisition Test, But They had the most improvement at Retention Test. Third, In hemiplegic adults, the Verbal & VTR Feedback group had the highest Retention Effect.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0