메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소 교과교육학연구 교과교육학연구 제19권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
1,027 - 1,040 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Korean government’s move to implement criterion-referenced assessment in secondary schools has impacted the nation socially and politically, as well as educationally. Since education policy is a matter not of only education itself but of a nation’s politics, culture and economy, the issue of criterion-referenced assessment has been hotly debated before and even during its implementation. With the government’s interest in implementing criterion-referenced assessment, this study examined the validity of its use using argument-based approaches to validity. Although the government’s attempt to implement criterion-referenced assessment in second education is worthwhile, it needs careful scrutiny with regard to the potential positive or negative effects of the new assessment program. This study showed how to build and support (or refute) arguments for (or against) the use of criterion-referenced assessment in the domain of English language subjects from various aspects. More specifically, it illustrated how to pose proper research questions based upon theoretical underpinnings of argument-based approaches to validity. By clarifying these issues, it is hoped that this study provides a better all-around understanding of criterion-referenced assessment in secondary English education and assessment in Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0