메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국18세기영문학회 18세기영문학 18세기영문학 제14권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
65 - 100 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the inextricable connection between mourning and justice in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Among the three concentric narratives, Victor’s story contains many deaths. All the deaths except Caroline’s are directly or indirectly caused by the Creature’s violence and demand mourning. But Victor fails to mourn successfully because he considers himself the real cause of those deaths in that he himself created the Creature. After his hopeless attempts to gain sympathy from humans, the Creature demands Victor to create a female companion as a right. To be able to mourn, Victor should comply with the Creature’s request and make things right. But his sense of duties towards his fellow-creatures leads him to break his promise to make the Creature a female companion, which incites the Creature’s rage. They get caught into a vicious circle of revenge in which retributive justice is the only raison d’être. The Creature cannot satisfy his desire for a sympathetic relation with another being and therefore destroy those who are dear to Victor. Victor gets devastated by the loss of his loved ones but cannot mourn for them successfully because he is partly responsible for those deaths. Only restorative justice can help them to break the logic of retributive justice and thereby the Möbius strip of mourning and justice. But neither of them is able to seek restorative justice and reconciliation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0