메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제31호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
645 - 667 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Under Article 73, Paragraphs 1, Item 3 of the Trademark Act, where a request for cancellation of trademark registration based on non-use is filed by a third party, the registration of such trademark may be cancelled for the reason of non-use unless the holder of the trademark right proves the following: (i) Within three years prior to the registration of the request for cancellation, (ii) in Korea, (iii) any of the holder of a trademark right, exclusive licensee or non-exclusive licensee, (iv) in connection with any of the designated goods pertaining to the request, (v) has used the registered trademark. In a concrete case, is a foreign company who holds a registered trademark in Korea, considered to be sufficiently using the registered trademark as far as the company's website contains the advertisement even if the company has never sold such goods in Korea? whether a certain advertisement is the use of a registered trademark in Korea is determined in a comprehensive manner in consideration of all relevant factors. In Japan, the following judgment rendered by the Intellectual Property High Court is an example of the case in which an advertisement that had been posted on a website was not recognized as the use of a registered trademark (December 20, 2005 Judgment of the Intellectual Property High Court, 2005 (Gyo-ke) No.10095): "The following facts are found: the Defendant has been posting advertisements relating to the provision of the designated goods "pizza" on its website; said website can be accessed from Japan; and the website can be immediately located if searched by several Japanese search engines by using the word constituting the registered trademark. However, said website is set up on a server in the country of the Defendant, and in addition, all contents thereof are indicated in English, and thus it cannot be recognized that the website is intended for Japanese consumers. Although said website can be accessed from Japan and is searchable by Japanese search engines, this fact is a matter of course as a website on the internet. It cannot be asserted that, based on this fact, the advertisement through said website falls under the use of the registered trademark in Japan." Reviewing the above case, it is important to prove that there are some relations between the advertisement of a registered trademark on the internet website and domestic consumers(Domestic relations, Inlandsbezug in Germany) in order to avoid the cancellation of a trademark registration based on non-use.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0