지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of the study is mainly to examine whether learners are able to improve their level of vocabulary through different types of planning activities. In addition, the study also aims at exploring the extent to which their vocabulary is improved and what difference is made with regard to the planning activities, which they utilized during their writing tasks. To see if planning activities was useful in improving the lexical quality of writing, three sets of timed compositions produced by 71 university students were analyzed using the Lexical Frequency Profile (LFP). The results indicated that there were significant differences among written compositions in terms of the three variables—word token, lexical variation, and lexical density. Overall, word token at most of the vocabulary levels tended to increase regardless of any type of planning activities while learners showed vocabulary improvement in terms of lexical variation including 1000 and ‘not in the list’ level. However, the result of lexical density showed that the planning activities did not affect the lexical density of the composition since learners got the highest scores in the first writing task with no planning activity. The implications of these findings are discussed with the usefulness of planning activities which help learners to effectively retrieve vocabulary and select correct forms.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
[단행본] -
Astika,G.G / 1993 / Analytical assessment of foreign students’ writing / RELC Journal 24 : 61 ~ 72
Beglar, D. / 1999 / Revising and validating the 2000 word level and university word level vocabulary tests / Language Testing 16 (2) : 131 ~ 162
Coady, J. / 1997 / Second language vocabulary acquisition:A rationale for pedagogy / Cambridge University Press
Engber,C / 1995 / The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions / Journal of Second Language Writing 4 : 139 ~ 155
Astika,G.G / 1993 / Analytical assessment of foreign students’ writing / RELC Journal 24 : 61 ~ 72
Beglar, D. / 1999 / Revising and validating the 2000 word level and university word level vocabulary tests / Language Testing 16 (2) : 131 ~ 162
Coady, J. / 1997 / Second language vocabulary acquisition:A rationale for pedagogy / Cambridge University Press
Engber,C / 1995 / The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions / Journal of Second Language Writing 4 : 139 ~ 155
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Analysis of Lexical Complexity in Korean EFL Students’ Narrative Writing
영어교과교육
2013 .01
-
한국어 텍스트의 어휘 다양도와 어휘 밀도 분석
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
Lexical Richness of One-Minute Speaking Task by Science and Technology University Students
Journal of Asia TEFL
2020 .01
-
한국 학생들의 영어 작문에 나타난 생산적 어휘에 관한 분석
영어학
2010 .03
-
한국인 대학생 학습자의 학문목적 영어 구술 프레젠테이션에 나타난 어휘 복잡성 분석: 숙달도와 성별에 따른 차이를 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2019 .11
-
한국어 쓰기능력 구성요소로서의 어휘에 대한 연구
이중언어학
2006 .01
-
Use of Achievement and Reduction Strategies in L2 Writing: Solutions for Productive Competencedeficit Lexical Problems
응용언어학
2008 .06
-
“詞價”(Lexical Value)及其在對外漢語學習詞典中的應用
중국어문학논집
2014 .12
-
Analysis of Mobile-based Vocabulary Learning Activities on University Students' Vocabulary Acquisition and Online Learning Behaviors
영어학연구
2019 .01
-
한국어 학습자의 `자기` 사용 양상에 따른 교수 방안 연구
한국어학
2011 .11
-
Lexical Profiles and Socioeducational Variables of Korean EFL University Learners
응용언어학
2012 .03
-
20세기의 국어 어휘와 어휘연구
국어국문학
2009 .09
-
Lexical Richness, Syntactic Complexity and Writing Performances of Chinese EFL Learners
영어영문학
2018 .02
-
Capturing Second Language Writing Competence: Analysis of Shell Noun Use and Lexical Richness
응용언어학
2019 .12
-
어휘함수와 한국어-러시아어 연어의 의미기술
러시아어문학연구논집
2009 .01
-
The Relationship between Different Dimensions of Lexical Proficiency and Writing Quality of Korean EFL Learners
응용언어학
2011 .09
-
효율적인 어휘 교수・학습에 대한 접근 방법 및 실제
영어영문학21
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0