개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine the main contents of the revised Industrial Safety and Health Act (hereinafter referred to as ISHA) in relation to the Act on Arrangement of Relevant Acts to Promote Work Style Reform (Reformation Act), which was enacted in April 2019 in Japan, and to draw implications from this analysis. The main contents of the revised ISHA can be divided into several areas. First, the acts strengthen the functions of industrial physicians and occupational health and includes a requirement that employers provide information necessary for industrial physicians to properly perform their duties. Second, with the exception of workers covered by the highly professional work system, employers must monitor workers’ working hours using methods specified by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Third, when workers who fall under the highly professional work system spend more than a designated length of time in the workplace, the employer is obliged to ensure that the workers are interviewed by and receive guidance from a medical doctor. By taking measures to restrain long working hours and by introducing a highly professional work system, these revisions strengthen employee health management by promoting employee health rights along with efficient work hour management.
In Korea, the revised Occupational Safety and Health Act (hereinafter referred to as “OSHA”) will be implemented beginning in 2021. However, because the main central purpose of the revised OSHA of Korea and the ISHA of Japan are totally different, this paper has encountered limitations in drawing implications for comparative research. The OSHA is mainly concerned with workers’ physical damage, prevention of industrial accidents and improvement of industrial safety based on the manufacturing industry. Also, preventive procedures for health maintenance and management, including the mental health of workers, are somewhat insufficient in the OSHA, according to evaluations. In the near future, like Japan’s ISHA, OSHA is expected to address lengthy work hours and employee health management in accordance with changes in the work hours legislation in Korea. Therefore, a discussion about employee health maintenance and management with respect to the OSHA, including addressing mental health issues, is imperative.
In Korea, the revised Occupational Safety and Health Act (hereinafter referred to as “OSHA”) will be implemented beginning in 2021. However, because the main central purpose of the revised OSHA of Korea and the ISHA of Japan are totally different, this paper has encountered limitations in drawing implications for comparative research. The OSHA is mainly concerned with workers’ physical damage, prevention of industrial accidents and improvement of industrial safety based on the manufacturing industry. Also, preventive procedures for health maintenance and management, including the mental health of workers, are somewhat insufficient in the OSHA, according to evaluations. In the near future, like Japan’s ISHA, OSHA is expected to address lengthy work hours and employee health management in accordance with changes in the work hours legislation in Korea. Therefore, a discussion about employee health maintenance and management with respect to the OSHA, including addressing mental health issues, is imperative.
#일본 일하는 방식 개혁법
#노동안전위생법
#산업안전보건법
#근로자의 건강권
#산업의(산업보건의)
#산업보건기능강화
#면접지도강화
#근로시간 상황파악 의무 확대
#Act on Arrangement of Relevant Acts to Promote Work Style Reform (Reformation Act)
#Industrial Safety and Health Act
#Occupational Safety and Health Act
#the right to health for employees
#industrial physicians
#strengthening the functions of occupational health environment
#monitoring work hours
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 일본 개정 노동안전위생법의 배경 및 논의동향
Ⅲ. 일본 노동안전위생법의 법체계 및 특성
Ⅳ. 일본 노동안전위생법의 개정 내용과 쟁점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
산업안전보건법상 도급인 사업주 책임강화 입법안 검토 - 제29조 개정을 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
산업안전보건법의 적용범위 확대와 대표이사에 대한 책임 강화
노동법포럼
2017 .11
-
산업안전보건법상 사업주의 안전보건조치의무 해석론의 전환 - 대법원 2021. 9. 30. 선고 2020도3996 판결의 시사점 -
노동법논총
2024 .08
-
산업재해 보고 위반 처벌제도 도입에 관한 소고
노동법논총
2016 .08
-
A Study on the Protection and Prevention of Worker’s Mental Health - The Occupational Safety and Health Act in South Korea -
노동법논총
2021 .04
-
중대재해처벌법의 법체계적 지위와 입법정책적 의의 고찰
노동법포럼
2021 .11
-
산업안전보건법상 작업중지권
노동법포럼
2015 .11
-
안전배려의무의 내용과 과제
노동법학
2015 .09
-
사내하도급·위험의 외주화에 대한 법적 규제 : 일본법령의 검토를 중심으로
강원법학
2016 .06
-
개정 산업안전보건법령의 현황과 문제점
노동법논총
2019 .08
-
정신건강 측면에서 본 산업안전보건 현황과 법적 과제
노동법연구
2019 .09
-
형법을 통한 산업안전관리의 한계와 위험성평가 제도의 도입
비교형사법연구
2016 .01
-
산업안전보건법의 보호대상인 근로자 개념의 해석에 관한 연구
노동법포럼
2022 .07
-
안전보건법령의 보호대상과 중대재해처벌법 적용의 문제
민주법학
2022 .07
-
산업안전과 형법 : 산업재해의 예방을 위한 형법의 역할
형사정책연구
2018 .03
-
근로자의 안전과 건강의 보호를 위한 사용자의 의무와 근로자의 권리
법과 정책연구
2023 .03
-
안전 관련 주요 법제 특징 비교 : 산업안전보건법, 중대재해처벌법, 학교안전법\
한국비교정부학보
2024 .03
-
근로자 건강진단시 정신검진항목의 도입 여부에 관한 법적 연구Ⅱ: 산업안전보건법 제26조의2 “고객의 폭언 등으로 인한 건강장해 예방 조치” 규정에 대한 함의
동아법학
2019 .11
-
근로관계에서 사용자의 취업시킬 의무와 근로자의 휴식
법학연구
2017 .01
-
산안법에서 위험작업의 근로자 보호방안 : 산안법의 이동식 크레인 작업을 중심으로
노동법논총
2018 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0