메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Roxana Kreimer (Center for Practical and Experimental Philosophy)
저널정보
강원대학교 인문과학연구소 Journal of Humanities Therapy Journal of Humanities Therapy Vol.7 No.2
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
1 - 16 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We’ve explored in the framework of Experimental Philosophy how our judgements and political ideas as fair or unfair tend to be biased by the opinions of prestigious figures. In the first study, subjects were randomly assigned to two groups, and they were asked to put a score of agreement (1-10) to several statements. In one group (“anonymous condition”) subjects didn’t know the author of the statement, while in the other group (“author condition”) the statement was attributed to a prestigious person. We’ve found that the statements attributed to prestigious persons received higher scores than the anonymous statements. In the second study, a similar procedure was employed, and we’ve found that subjects assigned lower scores to the statements that were attributed to politicians that they were unwilling to vote. In the third study, we’ve explored people’s opinions about two controversial events in Argentina that were interpreted in different ways by politicians of the governing party and of the opposition party, and we’ve found that most subjects agreed with the views adopted by their preferred party, even if they had little to do with politics. In the fourth study, subjects were randomly assigned to two groups (one group received previous information about the bias, while the other group didn’t receive that information), and we’ve found that when people were aware of this “author’s bias”, its influence decreased. The implications of this bias in relation to people’s judgements about justice will be analyzed.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Study 1 - Materials and Method
3. Study 2 - Materials and Method
4. Study 3 - Materials and Method
5. Study 4 - Materials and Method
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-001-000619530