지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.7
- 수록면
- 231 - 261 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.46834/jkmcah.2018.07.35.231
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main focus of this paper is analyzing the ceramic policies in 1930s, on the basis of the articles of Maeil-shinbo, and researching into the biggest issues at that time, that is, the industrialization of ceramic production for war preparation, the revival and restoration of local kilns, and the expansion of the ceramic–related culture through giving exhibitions and establishing crafts schools.
As an organ of the Japanese Government General of Korea published in the period of Japanese forced occupation, Maeil-shinbo showed a distinction from other newspapers in stature. The newspaper that covered economy, culture, the arts as well as the domestic situation in a accurate and detailed manner has usefulness as an important research material for understanding the first half of the period of Japanese forced occupation.
However, the purpose of the publication of this newspaper was mostly to emphasize the idea that Japan and Korea are one entity(內鮮一體) and make the Koreans loyal and obedient Japanese subjects(皇國臣民化). Therefore the newspaper reflected Japanese policies in a considerable amount of the articles. As for ceramics, the news on the regional places for production, producers, production status and products as well as exhibitions, crafts institutions, training and related information was reported in depth.
The issues about the articles relating to ceramics in 1930s, dealt in this paper, can be simply boiled down into two aspects represented by carrying out the plans to gain possible advantages from Korean ceramic industry for Japanese imperialism, and various supports for the restoration of local kilns, which obviously show that Japan’s twofold scheme, that is, supports and exploitation was politically motivated.
Especially from the mid-1930s, Japan went on a wartime footing, hence factory-based industrialization of ceramic industry and various problems derived from it were frequently covered under the headline. Actually, it is clearly noticeable that, compared to the first half of 1930s, in the second half, the exploitation of ceramic raw materials and ceramic products increased more and more for the purpose of securing war supplies. Ironically, this means that Chosun’s ceramic industry faced a serious crisis with deteriorated distribution networks, and fell into decline because of Japan’s war preparation.
At this time, an article saying that, going along with the governmental research institutions, Japanese Government General of Korea would present and carry out recovery plans for local kilns that had been in decline was reported. This is one of the reasons why we pay attention to Maeil-shinbo in that the recovery plans for Chosun’s ceramic industry were carried out in earnest for the first time throughout the whole period of Japanese forced occupation. Also, Japanese Government General of Korea showed its will to establish new ceramic genres by opening 《Chosun Fine Arts Exhibition(朝鮮美術展覽會)》 and 《Chosun Crafts for Export Exhibition(朝鮮輸出工藝展覽會)》, but it was also retrogressive and tactical. As mentioned above, the ceramic industry-related articles from Maeil-shinbo published in 1930s show that in many places, they contain the issues of the period, related to the ceramic policies that had the aspects of modernity and colonialism together.
The value of Maeil-shinbo as a research material has already been proven, but it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the records of the newspaper more elaborately because Maeil-shinbo is the only source that can provide the direct ground for understanding and inferring the condition and trends in the rapidly changing Chosun’s ceramic industry in 1930s. From now on, through researching the mass media run by Japanese government and many related research materials appeared in the post-war years, the whole aspects about the ceramic policies stated directly by imperial Japan need to be known.
As an organ of the Japanese Government General of Korea published in the period of Japanese forced occupation, Maeil-shinbo showed a distinction from other newspapers in stature. The newspaper that covered economy, culture, the arts as well as the domestic situation in a accurate and detailed manner has usefulness as an important research material for understanding the first half of the period of Japanese forced occupation.
However, the purpose of the publication of this newspaper was mostly to emphasize the idea that Japan and Korea are one entity(內鮮一體) and make the Koreans loyal and obedient Japanese subjects(皇國臣民化). Therefore the newspaper reflected Japanese policies in a considerable amount of the articles. As for ceramics, the news on the regional places for production, producers, production status and products as well as exhibitions, crafts institutions, training and related information was reported in depth.
The issues about the articles relating to ceramics in 1930s, dealt in this paper, can be simply boiled down into two aspects represented by carrying out the plans to gain possible advantages from Korean ceramic industry for Japanese imperialism, and various supports for the restoration of local kilns, which obviously show that Japan’s twofold scheme, that is, supports and exploitation was politically motivated.
Especially from the mid-1930s, Japan went on a wartime footing, hence factory-based industrialization of ceramic industry and various problems derived from it were frequently covered under the headline. Actually, it is clearly noticeable that, compared to the first half of 1930s, in the second half, the exploitation of ceramic raw materials and ceramic products increased more and more for the purpose of securing war supplies. Ironically, this means that Chosun’s ceramic industry faced a serious crisis with deteriorated distribution networks, and fell into decline because of Japan’s war preparation.
At this time, an article saying that, going along with the governmental research institutions, Japanese Government General of Korea would present and carry out recovery plans for local kilns that had been in decline was reported. This is one of the reasons why we pay attention to Maeil-shinbo in that the recovery plans for Chosun’s ceramic industry were carried out in earnest for the first time throughout the whole period of Japanese forced occupation. Also, Japanese Government General of Korea showed its will to establish new ceramic genres by opening 《Chosun Fine Arts Exhibition(朝鮮美術展覽會)》 and 《Chosun Crafts for Export Exhibition(朝鮮輸出工藝展覽會)》, but it was also retrogressive and tactical. As mentioned above, the ceramic industry-related articles from Maeil-shinbo published in 1930s show that in many places, they contain the issues of the period, related to the ceramic policies that had the aspects of modernity and colonialism together.
The value of Maeil-shinbo as a research material has already been proven, but it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the records of the newspaper more elaborately because Maeil-shinbo is the only source that can provide the direct ground for understanding and inferring the condition and trends in the rapidly changing Chosun’s ceramic industry in 1930s. From now on, through researching the mass media run by Japanese government and many related research materials appeared in the post-war years, the whole aspects about the ceramic policies stated directly by imperial Japan need to be known.
#1930년대
#매일신보
#조선총독부
#도자정책
#동화정책
#동아일보
#조선일보
#기관지
#민간지
#요업
#요업원료
#도자기생산
#일제강점기
#근대도자
#도자기전람회
#1930s
#Japanese Government General of Korea
#ceramic policies
#assimilation policy
#the Dong-A Ilbo
#the Chosun-Ilbo
#the organ of Japanese Government General of Korea
#newspapers published by Korean civilians
#ceramic industry
#raw materials for ceramic industry
#production of ceramics
#Japanese forced occupation
#ceramics of modern period
#ceramic exhibition
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ.『每日申報』의 정치적 위상과 1930년대 요업실태
Ⅲ. 1930년대 매일신보의 도자정책 기사관련 쟁점 분석
Ⅳ. 『매일신보』의 사료적 가치와 民間紙와의 비교 인식
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제강점기 요업활동 주체자로서의 재조일본인 구성과 그 식민성 연구
한국도자학연구
2021 .01
-
현대 도자미술의 ‘미디어 내러티브’에 관한 연구
기초조형학연구
2019 .12
-
섬유재를 활용한 도자 표현 연구
한국도자학연구
2019 .01
-
21세기 도자사 연구의 확장과 다변화
미술사학
2022 .08
-
Ceramic Road
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .08
-
영국 스튜디오 도자의 태동과 전개에 관한 연구
한국도자학연구
2019 .01
-
도자산업의 유통시장 분석 연구
한국도자학연구
2017 .01
-
디지털기법을 활용한 세라믹 내외장재 연구 및 디자인센터 실내공간 분석
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .10
-
스완요(石湾窑)의 도자 유형별 제작 기법 연구
조형디자인연구
2021 .09
-
근대 미국의 한국도자 수집경향의 지역적 차이와 그 의의
미술사학
2022 .08
-
현대도자미술의 생산방식과 지금에 대한 비평
기초조형학연구
2018 .02
-
근대전환기 국내 사료 분석을 통한 서양자기 사용실태 연구 : 식기를 중심으로
미술사학
2017 .02
-
National Image of Ceramic Product Design in China, 1949-1966
Archives of Design Research
2022 .05
-
초등학교 도자공예 교육 개선을 위한 미술 교과서 분석
기초조형학연구
2023 .08
-
도예 활동 특성이 직업 활동 의도에 미치는 영향 연구 - 일본 도쿄지역 사례 중심으로
기초조형학연구
2019 .08
-
현대도예의 물성표현에 관한 연구
기초조형학연구
2015 .04
-
도자 텍스처(Texture) 아트 펜던트(Art Pendant) 조명 디자인 개발
한국디자인포럼
2022 .11
-
압착성형 기법을 활용한 도자공예 문화상품 개발 연구
상품문화디자인학연구
2024 .03
-
도자공예 수업에 대한 초등학교 교사의 인식 연구
기초조형학연구
2024 .08
-
근대 유럽에서 한국도자에 대한 인식 변화와 그 배경
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-605-000326992