메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김태수 (서울대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제56집
발행연도
2018.9
수록면
23 - 43 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Wonhyo(元曉, 617-686) is harmonizing the disputes between the permanence and impermanence of the Body of Bliss(Saṃbhogakāya) in an epistemological way, such as ‘being called as permanent because it is ultimately serene’, and ‘being called as impermanent because it can act anything with its dynamic movement.’ It is an inclusive theory of harmony corresponding to the middle, without sticking to one’s position, as the opposite method of Anaikāntika-viruddhâvyabhicārin or Reductio ad absurdum which deduces ‘the two propositions and reasons being mutually conflicting whatever position one may follow.’ Yet, not only the method of ‘synthesizing or harmonizing the opposing perspectives’, but the logic of ‘deducing affirmation through negation’ which encompasses prasaṅga, dilemma or a fait accompli are also employed.
Adversely, it comprehensively synthesizes all views from the aspects of non-duality of dharmata(性) and characteristics of all things(相) after co-relating the theory of permanence in the line of dharmatā with the theory of impermanence in the line of all characteristics. It manifests bi-directional structure of open logic whether it places dharmatā or characteristics as its subject. Further, it also analyzes the way of harmonizing with Buddhavacana, which was understood in the context of the true nature of things(dharmatā) and logical principle(yukti).
Seen from the aspects of the secret mark of Buddha, it is expressed as the 4<SUP>th</SUP> koṭi, in that it transcends both of the characteristics and dharmatā. Meanwhile, from the aspects of the negation of both, it is expressed as the 3<SUP>rd</SUP> koṭi in the sense that these two positions are not different.
Likewise, it manifests a theory of circulation of meaning in its way of harmonizing the disputes. Through this method, it reduces dharmatā and characteristics to the non-dual middle way while creating the infinite meaning through intersecting affirmation and negation.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 보신 상주론과 무상론
Ⅲ. 보신 상주론과 무상론의 화쟁
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0