지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제104호
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 337 - 372 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2017.06.104.337
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The U.S. Military Government launched the ‘Korean Constabulary,’ which became the foundation for the Korean(South Korean) Army. It was supposed to maintain political neutrality. The political situation of recently liberated Korea was murky at best at the time, so the soldiers were not to disclose their political aspirations or preference, and also not to use the military for their own political agendas. But ironically, this ‘political neutrality principle’ turned out to be what eventually allowed elements from the South Korean Labor party to slip into military ranks. Increased ideological frictions amongst officers started to appear in the form of minor commotions, or incidents of soldiers crossing the border to go over to North Korea. Ultimately, even a series of revolts (usually called as the “Yeosoo-Sunchun Rebellion”) began to break out.
In response to such incidents, Minister of National Defense Lee Beom-seok ordered the installation of a ‘Troop Infornation&Education’ system, based upon his own experiences with the political warfare of the Kuomintang of China. This Chinese “Jeong-gong” system was from the Party’s own Leninist commissar legacy, and was designed to apply Fascist methods in army operations, for Anti-Communist purposes. Lee also inserted ‘Korea National Youth Corps’ agents -named after the Chinese training specialists- inside the units’ TI&E bodies, in order to train Korean troops just as the Kuomuntang did with their own soldiers.
But unlike the Chinese situation, the Korean political arena was composed of multiple parties and there was a notion of the aforementioned ‘political neutrality.’ So the Korean army’s TI&E had to be modified from the Chinese model before being applied to the Korean situation. Instead of building Party-controlled troops, the Korean system developed an administrative structure and through that enforced ideological conditioning of the soldiers. This kind of approach to troops orientation has so far been understood as a Fascist approach to the matter, but this seems like an issue that would have to be evaluated not only in terms of its implications in the Cold-war and U.S. interests and all, but also in terms of how the South Korean regime and society dealt with the constant possibility of civil disturbances in a ‘Northeast Asian way.’ Some might say it was not an ineffective methodology.
In response to such incidents, Minister of National Defense Lee Beom-seok ordered the installation of a ‘Troop Infornation&Education’ system, based upon his own experiences with the political warfare of the Kuomintang of China. This Chinese “Jeong-gong” system was from the Party’s own Leninist commissar legacy, and was designed to apply Fascist methods in army operations, for Anti-Communist purposes. Lee also inserted ‘Korea National Youth Corps’ agents -named after the Chinese training specialists- inside the units’ TI&E bodies, in order to train Korean troops just as the Kuomuntang did with their own soldiers.
But unlike the Chinese situation, the Korean political arena was composed of multiple parties and there was a notion of the aforementioned ‘political neutrality.’ So the Korean army’s TI&E had to be modified from the Chinese model before being applied to the Korean situation. Instead of building Party-controlled troops, the Korean system developed an administrative structure and through that enforced ideological conditioning of the soldiers. This kind of approach to troops orientation has so far been understood as a Fascist approach to the matter, but this seems like an issue that would have to be evaluated not only in terms of its implications in the Cold-war and U.S. interests and all, but also in terms of how the South Korean regime and society dealt with the constant possibility of civil disturbances in a ‘Northeast Asian way.’ Some might say it was not an ineffective methodology.
목차
머리말
1. 군대의 사상적 균열과 정훈 도입 논의
2. 정훈국의 구성과 중국국민당 정공의 변용
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선인민군 충원정책의 변화와 정체성 형성(1948~1950)
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
한국전쟁기 군악대와 정훈음악
로컬리티 인문학
2022 .10
-
여순사건 이후 군의 정훈 활동과 그 의미
사림
2017 .01
-
Идеологическая база политического дискурса
러시아학
2018 .01
-
Political Consumerism as Political Participation in Korea: The Influence of Anti-Business Sentiments, Political Ideology, and Social Media
Korea Observer
2021 .12
-
중국 정치외교용어의 한국어 대응어 비교 연구
번역학연구
2023 .06
-
1930년대 육군특별지원병제의 성립사 연구
한일관계사연구
2018 .08
-
이승만 박정희 정부의 한국군 베트남 파병 추진과 국회의 대응 - 의용군 파병논의를 중심으로 -
역사와현실
2020 .06
-
Troublesome Brotherhood: The Korean Volunteer Army and the CPC
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2020 .12
-
The Political Economy of South Korean Trade Growth and Social Change, 1963-2013
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2017 .03
-
Feature Book Review: A History of Chinese Political Thought
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2020 .02
-
한국전쟁기 중국군에 대한 이승만의 인식과 대응
역사비평
2022 .08
-
Exclusive Pakkey and Multidimensionality
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
The magnitude of articulatory gestures for the glide /w/ in Korean: Implications for the phonological representation of /w/
음성음운형태론연구
2020 .12
-
1910년대 미국의 한국에 대한 인식과 3.1운동에 대한 반응
역사와실학
2021 .04
-
재일동포사회를 통해서 본 한국다문화사회의 비판적 고찰
일본문화학보
2016 .02
-
Exhaustivity of –(n)un in Korean
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2017 .06
-
The Domestic Management and Media Coverage of Fallen Soldiers during the Korean War, 1950-1953
Korea Journal
2020 .06
-
1962년 이주당(貳主黨) 사건과 그 정치적 함의
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
612년 고구려 원정 隋軍의 군단 편성과 兵種 구성
한국고대사연구
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
AHP와 다차원척도법을 이용한 병과선정 요인분석 및 병과이미지 포지셔닝 전략 : 육사 여생도 설문결과를 중심으로
이새롬
,
강원석
경영관리연구
2016
.06
육군 내적가치 교육의 설계방향 고찰
조은영
,
정상근
,
박치범
외 2명
정신전력연구
2020
.05
이스라엘 군대의 정신전력 연구 : 지속과 변화를 중심으로
조우찬
정신전력연구
2019
.11
독일연방군 ‘내적지휘’ 철학의 한국적 적용 - 한국군의 ‘내적가치’ 프로그램 개발을 중심으로-
정상근
정신전력연구
2019
.08
군에 대한 국민의 인식 분석을 통한 정신전력 강화 방안
김태성
정신전력연구
2017
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001052314