지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제113호
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 381 - 410 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.09.113.381
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is the Iju-dang Party Incident of 1962, and the political nature of this very incident. The incident itself broke out in the wake of conflicts going on between the Korean military and the Korean Opposition party, and also right before the political power was transferred back to the civilian government. The nature of this incident was simple: The Military oppressed Jang Myeon, and the U.S Embassy in Korea decided to involve itself in internal matters of Korea. Yet previous studies focusing on this period only chose to examine either the ‘Korean Military and U.S.’ or the ‘Korean Military and the Opposing party’ as two major pillars involved in the situation, and as a result only highlighted the Korea-U.S. relationship or domestic Korean political turmoil. The Iju-dang party incident, which was at the very center of political changes that were ongoing at the time, has rarely received appropriate attention so far.
According to the review in this article, the Korean Military had clear objectives, and carefully staged the incident from the very beginning. It had one clear goal: to deprive Jang Myeon of any political power or influence. It was the Military’s intention to devalue Jang’s political stance, as the outcome of such scheme would also cripple the Korean Democratic party and weaken the opposition party’s eventual challenge against the incumbent regime. And it played right as it was intended. The Democratic party not only lost its leader but lost its political footing as well, when power was being transferred back to the civilian government in 1963.
After realizing what the Korean military was planning, the U.S. Embassy decided to step in. As a result, Jang Myeon got the protection he needed. But what the U.S. really did was to save Park Jeong-hi by apparently rescuing Jang Myeon. The U.S. government was concerned about the possibility that Park Jeong-hi’s harsh treatment of Jang Myeon may damage Park’s image on the international stage. The Americans were not really interested in restoring Jang Myeon’s influence or political quality. Jang Myeon was later ruled guilty while U.S. turned a blind eye to the situation. His political career was over.
Apparently the U.S. government, the Korean Military, and the Korean Opposing party shared some interests with each other, but also had clearly different priorities. The Iju-dang incident, which was a historical event that could potentially shed more light on the situation of the time, should be examined much further in the future, so that the dynamics between all three parties listed above could be more comprehensively understood.
According to the review in this article, the Korean Military had clear objectives, and carefully staged the incident from the very beginning. It had one clear goal: to deprive Jang Myeon of any political power or influence. It was the Military’s intention to devalue Jang’s political stance, as the outcome of such scheme would also cripple the Korean Democratic party and weaken the opposition party’s eventual challenge against the incumbent regime. And it played right as it was intended. The Democratic party not only lost its leader but lost its political footing as well, when power was being transferred back to the civilian government in 1963.
After realizing what the Korean military was planning, the U.S. Embassy decided to step in. As a result, Jang Myeon got the protection he needed. But what the U.S. really did was to save Park Jeong-hi by apparently rescuing Jang Myeon. The U.S. government was concerned about the possibility that Park Jeong-hi’s harsh treatment of Jang Myeon may damage Park’s image on the international stage. The Americans were not really interested in restoring Jang Myeon’s influence or political quality. Jang Myeon was later ruled guilty while U.S. turned a blind eye to the situation. His political career was over.
Apparently the U.S. government, the Korean Military, and the Korean Opposing party shared some interests with each other, but also had clearly different priorities. The Iju-dang incident, which was a historical event that could potentially shed more light on the situation of the time, should be examined much further in the future, so that the dynamics between all three parties listed above could be more comprehensively understood.
목차
머리말
1. 이주당 사건과 이주당의 ‘실체’
2. 주한미국대사관의 개입과 이주당 사건의 귀결
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일제시기 행정구역의 개편과 명칭의 변화 -면을 중심으로-
한국독립운동사연구
2020 .05
-
18~19세기 동래부 동하면의 ‘면중(面中)’과 잡역운영
역사와현실
2019 .06
-
조선후기 機張縣의 面里制
역사와 세계
2018 .12
-
15세기 粉靑沙器장군의 용도와 특징
한국학연구
2016 .06
-
군부 권위주의로 회귀하는 미얀마 - 민간-군부관계로 본 쿠데타의 역동성 -
역사교육
2022 .03
-
무위당 장일순의 생명의 사상과 공생의 사회운동
공동체문화와 민속 연구
2021 .03
-
1963년 박정희 군사정부의 민정이양 과정과 미국의 개입
역사학보
2022 .12
-
창군기 한국군 정훈의 도입 과정과 중국국민당 정공의 변용
역사와현실
2017 .06
-
1960년대 김대중의 정치적 부상과 야당의 ‘근대화’
역사와현실
2022 .06
-
베트남전쟁 한국군 철수와 국내의 여론·정치 동향
역사와현실
2020 .06
-
｢심씨를 위해 지은 시｣의 보조적 인물 ‘장 파총’ 고찰
국문학연구
2018 .01
-
장정일의 문학에서 지역의 의미 (1): 80년대 문화운동과 거점이라는 키워드를 중심으로
동남어문논집
2024 .05
-
미얀마 군부 지배의 역사적 고찰 - 그 정치 동력의 구조
역사비평
2021 .08
-
지구당 폐지 전후 한국정당의 변화 및 발전방안 연구
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
고전인물 발굴을 통한 문화콘텐츠 개발 연구 -금헌 이장곤과 역사다큐멘터리-
우리어문연구
2020 .01
-
수원 만세시위의 양상과 특징
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
매개자로서의 오장환 : 해방기 오장환 시론의 생성 과정 연구
한국시학연구
2018 .08
-
1914년 전후의 논산군 행정 구획 및 지명 변화 연구
어문연구
2022 .03
-
가사 한역시 「新翻俛仰亭長歌」의 시가사적 의의
어문학
2015 .03
-
1920년대 ‘사상사건(思想事件)’의 치안유지법 적용 및 형사재판과정
역사연구
2019 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
구소련 자료로 재구축한 북한의 국가 형성사 - 기광서, 『북한 국가의 형성과 소련』(선인, 2018)
조수룡
역사와현실
2019
.12
1930년대 초반 경성의 의료접근성 문제와 부립경비진료소 설치 논쟁
이순영
역사와현실
2019
.12
조선 광해군대 궁궐공사에 대한 이해와 서술 - 사실, 연구, 교육의 거리와 괴리 -
오항녕
역사와현실
2019
.12
6~7세기 신라(新羅)의 보살계(菩薩戒) 수용과 확산
김희연
역사와현실
2019
.12
1970년대 미국 대한원조정책의 변화와 한국 주택문제 개입 : 주택금융시장의 형성과 재편을 중심으로
이휘현
역사와현실
2019
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0