지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Tax systems can be divided into a self-assessment system and a government-assessment system. Most countries including South Korea apply the self-assessment system to most items including the income tax, the corporate tax and the value added tax.
In the case of the income tax under the self-assessment system, the tax amount is calculated based on the direct materials such as the taxpayer’s account, which is referred to as ‘actual amount-taxation.’ In cases where it is difficult or impossible to investigate the direct materials and thus to calculate the actual amount, however, there is no alternative but to estimate the tax amount from indirect materials, which is referred to as ‘estimated taxation.’
In South Korea, the amount of income was estimated by the standard income rate in the past. However, the standard income rate violates the ability-to-pay principle and the principle of tax equity as well, with which many problems had constantly brought up against the standard income rate. At this, the standard income rate was changed into the basic expense rate (simple expense rate) in 2002, but there is no denying that is also cannot solve the existing problems; to be concrete, the standard income rate is calculated by being multiplied by the amount of income, and the basic expense rate is calculated by being subtracted from the amount of income. In short, they are not much different from each other in substance.
As a result, the estimated taxation system also violates the ability-to-pay principle and the principle of tax equity as well. Thus, it needs to be changed as in the following:
Under the current law, the methods of estimated taxation are regarded as illustrative regulations. The problem is that tax amount varies depending upon the method of estimated taxation, and so it is not advisable in terms of predictability. Accordingly, it is required to more concretely specify ‘the other methods that are accepted by the director of the national tax service as reasonable’ in item 3 of clause 3 of article 143 of the enforcement decree of the income tax act in order to give taxpayers predictability.
One of the most important factors in estimated taxation is the basic expense rate or the simple expense rate. Nevertheless, in Korea, the current two rates are destitute of rationality; more specifically, the basic expense rate is at a very low level, but the simple expense rate is at a very high level. As the case stands, the two rates need to be balanced with each other.
Obviously, estimated taxation is a method to determine the tax amount; hence, the method needs to be refined on in accordance with the ability-to-pay principle.
In the case of the income tax under the self-assessment system, the tax amount is calculated based on the direct materials such as the taxpayer’s account, which is referred to as ‘actual amount-taxation.’ In cases where it is difficult or impossible to investigate the direct materials and thus to calculate the actual amount, however, there is no alternative but to estimate the tax amount from indirect materials, which is referred to as ‘estimated taxation.’
In South Korea, the amount of income was estimated by the standard income rate in the past. However, the standard income rate violates the ability-to-pay principle and the principle of tax equity as well, with which many problems had constantly brought up against the standard income rate. At this, the standard income rate was changed into the basic expense rate (simple expense rate) in 2002, but there is no denying that is also cannot solve the existing problems; to be concrete, the standard income rate is calculated by being multiplied by the amount of income, and the basic expense rate is calculated by being subtracted from the amount of income. In short, they are not much different from each other in substance.
As a result, the estimated taxation system also violates the ability-to-pay principle and the principle of tax equity as well. Thus, it needs to be changed as in the following:
Under the current law, the methods of estimated taxation are regarded as illustrative regulations. The problem is that tax amount varies depending upon the method of estimated taxation, and so it is not advisable in terms of predictability. Accordingly, it is required to more concretely specify ‘the other methods that are accepted by the director of the national tax service as reasonable’ in item 3 of clause 3 of article 143 of the enforcement decree of the income tax act in order to give taxpayers predictability.
One of the most important factors in estimated taxation is the basic expense rate or the simple expense rate. Nevertheless, in Korea, the current two rates are destitute of rationality; more specifically, the basic expense rate is at a very low level, but the simple expense rate is at a very high level. As the case stands, the two rates need to be balanced with each other.
Obviously, estimated taxation is a method to determine the tax amount; hence, the method needs to be refined on in accordance with the ability-to-pay principle.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 소득세법상 추계과세제도의 의의
Ⅲ. 주요 국가의 소득세법상 추계과세제도
Ⅳ. 현행 소득세법상 추계과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
법인지방소득세의 과세적합성과 개선방향에 대한 연구
세무회계연구
2021 .01
-
소득세 세율구조의 개선 방안에 관한 연구
국제회계연구
2018 .04
-
우리나라 법인세율의 합리화 방안
세무학연구
2024 .03
-
1차산업 지방소득세 과세 효과 분석
산업경제연구
2017 .12
-
코로나19 이후 소득세 과세기반 분포의 변화와 정책적 함의
조세연구
2023 .06
-
Optimal Income Tax Rates for the Korean Economy
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2015 .08
-
The Distribution of Tax Collectability, Quality of Tax Services Efforts to Tax Coverage Ratio
유통과학연구
2023 .06
-
퇴직소득세 과세체계의 문제점과 개선방안
국제회계연구
2023 .08
-
중국 부동산기업 세법의 주요 쟁점 연구
경영법률
2022 .04
-
우리나라 법인세수의 결정요인에 대한 실증분석
예산정책연구
2018 .01
-
인적용역사업자에 대한 소득세 과세제도 개선방안 연구
세무와회계저널
2015 .01
-
유통효율성 제고를 위한 농업소득 과세의 필요성과 과세방안
식품유통연구
2016 .01
-
인적용역 과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안
회계정보연구
2016 .01
-
소득세 격차 비교를 통한 근로소득과세 개선방안 연구
산업경제연구
2018 .02
-
매출액 크기에 따른 제조기업의 계속사업손익법인세비용(부의법인세비용)과 기업가치간 관련성
경영경제연구
2018 .02
-
우리나라의 조세체계와 교회 세금납부에 관한 고찰
로고스경영연구
2021 .12
-
지방소득세의 개편에 따른 문제점과 개선방안
세무와회계저널
2015 .01
-
새정부 기업과세의 바람직한 방향 -2022년 세제개편안을 중심으로-
기업법연구
2022 .09
-
세금명칭변경후 선호도에 따른 세금이해와 납세순응의 효과분석
세무와회계저널
2015 .01
-
소득세법상 국외전출세 과세제도의 개선방안
조세학술논집
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-000875923