메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
법무부 국제법무정책과 통상법률 통상법률 제50호
발행연도
2003.4
수록면
81 - 115 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Like product is a central concept in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. It appears in numerous provisions, and then defines to which products the rights and obligations of the GATT Agreement apply. Although it is a central concept, and has been around since the origins of GATT in 1947, the definition of like products is not settled. The meaning of like product is likely to vary from one GATT provision to another. This statement suggests that, notwithstanding the lack of a precise definition, there may be a identifiable and describable differences in the meaning, or at least the range of meaning, accorded to that term from one Articles to another. The purpose of this paper is to examine one setting in which such a difference of meaning might be expected to occur. This paper asks whether such a policy-based difference in meaning can be found between the meaning accorded to the like product concept in the Most Favoured Nation obligation of GATT Article Ⅰ: 1, and the the meaning accorded to the like product concept in the National Treatment obligations of paragraphs 2 and 4 of GATT Article Ⅲ In conclusion, the analysis suggests Articles III(2) (first sentence), III(4) use like to connote identity or very close similarity. Articles I(1) might extend beyond that to interchangeable items. Articles III(2) (second sentence) appears to extend beyond identity or close similarity to encompass entirely distinct yet interchangeable goods.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-002332454