메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권유성 (제주대학교)
저널정보
다빈치미래교양연구소 교양학연구 교양학연구 제4집
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
7 - 28 (22page)
DOI
10.24173/jge.2016.12.4.7

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study intends to consider the process that culture(bildung)-literature discourses were formed during the 1910~20’s in Korea. It was the modern transformation of system that was the most emphasized in that period. And the rapid importation of knowledge was critical to it. In Korea, the formative process of modern culture(bildung) concept was obliged to influenced in such situation.
The word cultivate was more important than the word cultured/uncultured during the 1910~20’s in Korea. And the word cultivate was more frequently used by intellectuals in that time. Especially, the word cultivate used to employ when it was clear hierarchy between subject and object of culture(bildung). In other words, if the subject of culture(bildung) was limited to the sphere of some intellectuals, the object of it was extended to very broad sphere of kids, women, workers and farmers. Such subalterns in the nations couldn"t be the subject of culture(bildung) for oneself. Because korean intellectuals had to be overwhelmed with the Western civilization in that time.
Meanwhile, it was similar process that literature discourse occupied the heart of culture(bildung) discourses. Especially in condition of that the lists of literary culture were not still canonized, the word literature could not help working to unlearned people with repressive signifie.

목차

1. 들어가며: 속도의 근대와 지식
2. 교양 주체와 대상의 위계 설정 : ‘교양 있다/없다’와 ‘교양하다’의 차이
3. 위계적 교양 담론의 형성과 ‘문예’
4. 나오며: 식민지의 교양
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-005-002222757