메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

Possibility and Limitation of Applying Discourse Theory in Criminal Procedure
Recommendations
Search
Questions

형사절차에서 대화윤리 적용의 가능성과 한계

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Park, Kang Woo (충북대)
Journal
Legal Research Institute KOOKMIN UNIVERSITY Seoul Korea KOOKMIN LAW REVIEW Vol.29 No.2 (Wn.54) KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.10
Pages
99 - 125 (27page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Possibility and Limitation of Applying Discourse Theory in Criminal Procedure
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
An important issue in contemporary societies is how to warrant the legitimacy of law. Legitimation of law calls for moral standards. Development in modern law, however, show a disconnection from its traditional moral foundations and tendency towards legal instrumentality in regulating highly complex society. Focusing on the effectiveness of law and disregarding its normative premisses endangers the legitimacy of law.
So, this paper will try to the dicourse theory of Juergen Habermans and to examine the possibility and limitation of applying the discourse theory in criminal procedure. The first part deals with Habermas"s view on opening legal procedures to a moral-practical discourse. I argue that his model of procedural rationality provides insufficient grounds for the legitimacy of law, because it includes only formal conditions for moral-legal argumentation without offering moral norms that can serve as substantive basis for this argumentation. To solve this problem of form and substance, a practical discourse in legal procedure must take some moral norms as its substantive point of departure. In this respect, I consider human rights the most likely candidates and try to show that integration of a practical-legal discourse into criminal procedure is of special importance in creating a more humane legal system. Finally, I contend that human rights are the necessary substantive ingredients for this argumentation to guarantee the legitimacy of criminal law.
#대화이론 #형사절차 #근대법 #막스 베버 #하버마스 #법의 정당성 #discourse theory #criminal procedure #modern law #Max Weber #Habermas #legitimacy of law

Contents

I. 서론
II. 법적 절차와 도덕적 - 실천적 대화
III. 형사절차에서 실천적 - 법적 대화
IV. 형사사법의 절차화
V. 맺음말
참고문헌
국문초록
ABSTRACT

References (19)

Add References
[단행본] - A. Welmer / 1986 / Ethik und Dialog google schola [단행본] - Axel Honneth / 1986 / Moralität und Sittlichkeit / Suhrkamp google schola [단행본] - J. Habermas / 1984 / Theory of Communicative Action, Vol, I / Beacon Press google schola [단행본] - J. Habermans / 1986 / Moralität und Sittlichkeit / Suhrkamp google schola [단행본] - J. Habermas / 1992 / Fakzität und Geltung / Suhrkamp google schola

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

中韩关系为什么受制于朝鲜和美国？
董向荣Hansun Foundation2016.02
 Design of the Outlet-Port Tube of a Cyclone-Type Oil Separator for a Compressor
Seongil Jang, Joon AhnThe Society Of Air-Conditioning And Refrigerating Engineers Of Korea2015.08
 Development of Secondary Battery Pouch for Electric Vehicles using Roll to Roll Gravure Coating Technology
M. S. Yu, M. Kim, D. S. KimKorean Society for Precision Engineering2018.05

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-360-001630282