개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to examine not only the metaphorical linguistic expressions and find out their conceptual metaphors, but also the metonymic expressions in the English Bible. From the analysis of those two figurative speeches in the Bible, we can understand the Bible and the language in those days better.
The findings of this study are as follows:
Like the modern English, some of the conceptual metaphors and metonymic expressions found in the study are pervasive in the distance language of the Bible. According to these observations, we can say that people in those days had metaphorical thinking like modern people.
From the analysis of the conceptual metaphors in the Bible, we can see that ‘life,’ an abstract concept, is understood in terms of journey, war. Thus, one abstract concept is conceptualized in terms of several different concrete concepts. This observation corresponds to Kövecses (2002: 6). In the Bible, structural metaphors allow us to use one highly structured and clearly delineated concept to structure another, which corresponds to the Lakoff and Johnson (1980: 61). As for orientational metaphors in the Bible, upward orientation tends to go with a positive evaluation, but downward orientation with a negative one; more specifically, the positive concepts such as health, joy, happiness, and life have upward direction, along with God and Jesus, who have a powerful authority and life, whereas the negative concepts relating to earthly things such as sickness, sadness, unhappiness, and death have downward direction. However, positivenegative evaluation is not limited to the spatial orientation up-down. In other words, ‘in,’ ‘before,’ and ‘front’ are mostly regarded as a positive evaluation, but ‘out,’ ‘after’ and ‘back’ as a negative one.
There is little difference, if any, between the conceptual metaphors in the everyday language and those in the Bible. We can observe that the source and target domains above are also common not only in our everyday language but also in the Bible. It is noticeable to see that there are some expressions in which more than two domains are used, and some metaphorical linguistic expressions may not contain lexical items in the target domain, in the Bible as well as in our everyday language.
A little difference is found between the conceptual metaphors in the everyday language and those in the Bible. Unlike our ordinary language, the Trinity can be the main target domain in the Bible. From the metaphorical linguistic expressions, we can find that the Christians’ beliefs differ from those of non-Christians in some ways.
The findings of this study are as follows:
Like the modern English, some of the conceptual metaphors and metonymic expressions found in the study are pervasive in the distance language of the Bible. According to these observations, we can say that people in those days had metaphorical thinking like modern people.
From the analysis of the conceptual metaphors in the Bible, we can see that ‘life,’ an abstract concept, is understood in terms of journey, war. Thus, one abstract concept is conceptualized in terms of several different concrete concepts. This observation corresponds to Kövecses (2002: 6). In the Bible, structural metaphors allow us to use one highly structured and clearly delineated concept to structure another, which corresponds to the Lakoff and Johnson (1980: 61). As for orientational metaphors in the Bible, upward orientation tends to go with a positive evaluation, but downward orientation with a negative one; more specifically, the positive concepts such as health, joy, happiness, and life have upward direction, along with God and Jesus, who have a powerful authority and life, whereas the negative concepts relating to earthly things such as sickness, sadness, unhappiness, and death have downward direction. However, positivenegative evaluation is not limited to the spatial orientation up-down. In other words, ‘in,’ ‘before,’ and ‘front’ are mostly regarded as a positive evaluation, but ‘out,’ ‘after’ and ‘back’ as a negative one.
There is little difference, if any, between the conceptual metaphors in the everyday language and those in the Bible. We can observe that the source and target domains above are also common not only in our everyday language but also in the Bible. It is noticeable to see that there are some expressions in which more than two domains are used, and some metaphorical linguistic expressions may not contain lexical items in the target domain, in the Bible as well as in our everyday language.
A little difference is found between the conceptual metaphors in the everyday language and those in the Bible. Unlike our ordinary language, the Trinity can be the main target domain in the Bible. From the metaphorical linguistic expressions, we can find that the Christians’ beliefs differ from those of non-Christians in some ways.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 성경에서의 비유적 표현 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
〈Abstracts〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일상 언어와 영어 성경에서의 ‘인생’의 개념화 양상
신학과 목회
2018 .05
-
인지적 관점에서 본 은유적 표현 분석 : ‘시간’을 중심으로
신학과 목회
2017 .05
-
은유의 언어학적 분석 및 해석
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
경제담론 상에 나타난 은유표현의 인지언어학적 연구
언어과학
2016 .01
-
1912년 간행된 중국어 성경의 언어 특징 연구 — 『쉐레쉐브스키 쉬운 문리역』과 『관화체화합본』의 마태복음을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2022 .08
-
요한복음서의 은유 표현 양상 연구
언어과학
2015 .01
-
영어 성경 번역의 역사
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
Bible: Les récits fondateurs : (S. Bloch, F. Boyer, Montrouge: Bayard, 2016)
성경원문연구
2021 .04
-
A Study on Anger Emotion in English and Chinese
영어영문학
2016 .11
-
인지언어학적 관점에서의 은유와 은유 번역 분석 : 대통령과 장관 연설문 텍스트를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
사랑의 개념화 양상 -한국어, 중국어, 몽골어를 중심으로-
신학과 목회
2019 .11
-
A Study on Metaphor in Thought and Social Action
새한영어영문학
2023 .11
-
존 웨슬리와 성서
신학과세계
2023 .06
-
A Comparative Study of Food Metaphors in Filipino and English
언어학연구
2018 .01
-
A Study on Conceptual Metaphors in Business Advertising
영어학
2024 .01
-
汉·韩语“睁”和“뜨다”的隐喻对比浅析
국제언어문학
2022 .08
-
A Survey of Vision Conceptual Metaphor Mechanism: A Comparative Study Based on the Corpus of Vision Metaphor in English and Chinese
언어학
2024 .03
-
An Interactive Approach to Interpretation of Emotion Metaphor
언어과학연구
2017 .03
-
<기쁜소식성경>(Good News Bible)의 1992년 개정과 그 배경
성경원문연구
2020 .04
-
A Cross-Cultural Analysis on Conceptual Metaphors Used in the Written Reports of Disease Outbreak by Mainstream Media
영어학
2025 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
아우구스티누스의 영적 체험과 영성신학적 함의
심종혁
,
이영남
신학전망
2015
.09
호세아서 1장 2절-2장 15절에 나타난 은유의 부각과 은폐
김주환
신학논단
2015
.03
[창세기 강해] 요셉의 꿈과 하나님의 뜻 (창 37:5-11)
김정우
헤르메네이아 투데이
2005
.07
환상(illusion), 현실, 중간현상(transitionalphenomena) : 프로이드와 위니캇트의 종교이해를 중심으로 본 삶과 믿음의 이원화 문제
김진영
복음과 신학
2001
.08
바울과 소스테네 : 사도행전 18장 17절에 대한 소고
이승호
신학과 목회
2011
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-230-000708028