메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박해원 (충북대학교) 김세형 (충북대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제25권 제1호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2016.2
수록면
1,555 - 1,565 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study has analyzed game record factors that influence victory or defeat based on the scoring of 10 men’s pro basketball teams in 2014-2015. Particularly, this study is intended to analyze and predict the causes of victory or defeat in men’s pro basketball by newly adding each team’s allowance variable as one of the game record factors. For this study, among the game factors officially defined by the Korean Basketball League (KBL), this author selected 10 factors, FT, 2P, 3P, OFF, DEF, AST, ST, W/FT, W/OFT, TO, and constructed the success variables based on success in each team and the allowance variables based on the allowances from the opponent team. Also, to analyze the effects of those game record factors on their victory or defeat statistically, both the independent t-test and logistic regression analysis were conducted. For the two statistical analyses, SPSS 22.0 was employed, and the significant level was set as.05. According to the results of the independent t-test, success in FT, 2P, DEF, AST, ST, W/FT, TO among the success variables as well as success in FT, 2P, AST, W/FT among the allowance variables indicated statistically significant difference. According to the results of the logistic regression analysis, as the game record factors to predict victory, out of the success variables, success in FT, 2P, 3P, DEF, ST, W/FT, and TO showed statistically significant difference. In more detail, there is more possibility of victory if success in FT, 2P, 3P, DEF, ST is more or if W/FT, TO is less. Concerning the allowance variables, there is higher possibility of victory when success in FT, AST, ST is less or when W/FT is more.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-002641471