메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제12집 제4호
발행연도
2010.12
수록면
243 - 278 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper reviews the Advisory Opinion rendered by the ICJ on22 July 2010. The Opinion was on "Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in respect of Kosovo" The ICJ, firstly, considered whether the request for the advisory opinion of the General Assembly was within the ambit of the competence of the General Assembly. On the first question, the ICJ answered affirmatively. Secondly, the ICJ considered whether, in consideration of its judicial function, it is appropriate for the ICJ to give the advisory opinion requested. The ICJ pronounced that it should not be refused to give an advisory opinion except when there were compelling reasons not to do so. after the ICJ dealt with the jurisdictional issues, then it moved on to the substantial issues. In dealing with the substantial issues, the ICJ applied the general international law in order to determine whether the unilateral declaration of independence of the Provisional Institutions of the Self-Government of Kosovo was in accordance with international law. In that consideration, the ICJ followed the jurisprudence of the Lotus case. The ICJ delivered that, since there is no rule prohibiting the unilateral declaration of independence, the unilateral declaration is not unlawful under international law. But, the decision of the ICJ on this point is too technical and escapes the focal point of the case. Actually this case is involved with the question of the right of self-determination, in a sense that Kosovo is an entity to declare independence by way of the exercise of external right of self-determination or remedial secession. Although the ICJ had an opportunity to decide on the concept and the requirements to exercise the right of self-determination, it lost the chance deliberatively. On deciding the substantial issues, the ICJ, then applied the Security Council Resolution 1244 and other rules derived from it as lex specialis. In respect of Resolution 1244, the ICJ technically avoided the question of applicability of that Resolution. The ICJ simply decided that since Resolution 1244 is intended to be applicable in the interim stage of Kosovo, it is not applicable to the unilateral declaration which is the final stage of Kosovo. And also, with respect to the UNMIK regulations including the Constitutional Framework, the ICJ technically denied the applicability of them because the declaration of independence was issued by an entity which was not the addressee of the regulations.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002574269