지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Amongst the diverse areas in Korean ancient historical studies, military institutions would probably be the area that remains least explored. Lack of historical data and records would be the primary reason for that, but lack of respect for this particular area may also have had something to do with that as well. People tend to consider the history of the military as a subset of other kinds of historical studies: political, economic and social. Military institution would usually be discussed only within other historical studies dealing with central political offices or local administration.
Examined in this article are the Shilla Jang-gun figures, who were supreme commanders of the Shilla army in the 6<SUP>th</SUP> and 7<SUP>th</SUP> centuries when the war among three dynasties was raging throughout the Korean peninsula. Their nature, and how the Jang-gun system was operated, are topics of particular interest in this paper. In wartime situations, these Jang-gun figures seem to have served in the field and apparently did so representing the authority of the king. In thar regard they were distinctively different from other ordinary military officers, and with such huge power vested by the king, they were responsible for everything that was going on in the regions they were put in charge of. This kind of nature of the Shilla Jang-gun figures shows similarities with the Chinese dynasties’ Haeng’gun Chong’gwan figures, and such existing similarities between both countries’ systems would have allowed Shilla to have no difficulty accepting such foreign institution, in the mid-7th century.
Meanwhile, another figure called ‘Gunju,’ which was also a commanding officer other than the Jang-gun figures, started to emerge during this period. In previous studies, these Jang-gun figures and Gunju entities were considered as practically the same entities. According to records, however, it is revealed that they were appointed with different principles and standards, and while the Gunju figures were authorized to operate in a limited area of space, the Jang-gun figures were not bound by such regional perimeters. One might say the former was a local official in charge of a specifically designated area, while the latter was an entity representing the king and burdened with the responsibility to first and foremost win the war.
With a new understanding of the nature of the Jang-gun figures who led the war for Shilla in the 6<SUP>th</SUP> and 7<SUP>th</SUP> centuries, we can see they were no ordinary military officers or local figures. Further understanding of the political and administrative aspects of their primary function and role would be useful in advancing our understanding of other areas in Korean ancient history.
Examined in this article are the Shilla Jang-gun figures, who were supreme commanders of the Shilla army in the 6<SUP>th</SUP> and 7<SUP>th</SUP> centuries when the war among three dynasties was raging throughout the Korean peninsula. Their nature, and how the Jang-gun system was operated, are topics of particular interest in this paper. In wartime situations, these Jang-gun figures seem to have served in the field and apparently did so representing the authority of the king. In thar regard they were distinctively different from other ordinary military officers, and with such huge power vested by the king, they were responsible for everything that was going on in the regions they were put in charge of. This kind of nature of the Shilla Jang-gun figures shows similarities with the Chinese dynasties’ Haeng’gun Chong’gwan figures, and such existing similarities between both countries’ systems would have allowed Shilla to have no difficulty accepting such foreign institution, in the mid-7th century.
Meanwhile, another figure called ‘Gunju,’ which was also a commanding officer other than the Jang-gun figures, started to emerge during this period. In previous studies, these Jang-gun figures and Gunju entities were considered as practically the same entities. According to records, however, it is revealed that they were appointed with different principles and standards, and while the Gunju figures were authorized to operate in a limited area of space, the Jang-gun figures were not bound by such regional perimeters. One might say the former was a local official in charge of a specifically designated area, while the latter was an entity representing the king and burdened with the responsibility to first and foremost win the war.
With a new understanding of the nature of the Jang-gun figures who led the war for Shilla in the 6<SUP>th</SUP> and 7<SUP>th</SUP> centuries, we can see they were no ordinary military officers or local figures. Further understanding of the political and administrative aspects of their primary function and role would be useful in advancing our understanding of other areas in Korean ancient history.
목차
머리말
1. 전시(戰時)장군의 역할
2. 장군의 운용 원리
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
唐 後期 중앙권력의 將領 관리·통제 시도
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .04
-
조선 시대 『장감박의(將鑑博議)』의 간행과 활용
한국학논집
2025 .03
-
15세기 粉靑沙器장군의 용도와 특징
한국학연구
2016 .06
-
백제에서의 장군호 수용과 막부제
역사와현실
2015 .09
-
唐 九成宮의 김인문 친필 書跡
신라사학보
2015 .08
-
중국어 상표지 ‘將’의 문법화 과정에 대한 고찰
중국언어연구
2016 .01
-
语篇视角下的“之所以~是因为~”考察
중국어교육과연구
2016 .06
-
항재 이광신의 隨事精察心理심학종지와 하곡 「浩然章」 해석의 계승
양명학
2017 .04
-
손에 장을 지져요
수필미학
2024 .09
-
여성노동에 대한 유가 담론과 그 재생산 방식에 대하여
여성문학연구
2016 .01
-
연산군과 광해군 최후의 장면
문학치료연구
2018 .01
-
근대시기 영산강 유역(담양군과 화순군) 면직물 생산 문화의 특징: 섬진강 유역의 구례군과의 비교를 중심으로
복식문화연구
2016 .08
-
「豆善富 墓誌銘」과 그 一家에 대한 몇 가지 검토
인문학연구
2015 .01
-
백제 멸망 이후 예씨(禰氏) 일족의 위상 : 묘지명(墓誌銘)과 관련 문헌의 종합적 검토를 통해
역사와현실
2016 .09
-
한국사에서의 漢四郡 認識
고조선단군학
2022 .04
-
신라 문소군, 숭선군의 구조와 군현 편성 원리
한국학논집
2019 .03
-
<청백운>에 나타난 <삼국지연의>의 수용 양상과 의미
장서각
2016 .04
-
중국 도가(道家)에서의 장(場)이론의 확장과 적용
중국지식네트워크
2020 .01
-
통각(痛覚) 오노마토피어에 관한 일·한 대조연구
일본어학연구
2021 .12
-
1920년대 조선의 군제(郡制) 논의와 조선총독부의 ‘군도제(郡島制)’ 구상
역사와현실
2025 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001981803