지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (10)
2020
2019
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper discusses the “utagai”(dubitative) reading of the Japanese "(no)darouka" construction and its usages, on the basis of the speakers’ epistemic judgments. The main proposals of this paper are as follows:
(1) The “cannot form a judgment” analysis of the previous researches has been divided into “inquiring”, “interrogative+(no)darouka”, and “guess/thinking” usages; the “epistemic modality” analysis of the previous researches has been divided into “guess by evidence”, “dubitative”, and “assertion” usages.
(2) The viewpoint of this paper, i.e. How is the speaker’s epistemic judgment on “situation content” under a certain background information of the speaker?, has made it possible to provide a gradable and unified analysis such that “inquiring”, “interrogative+(no)darouka”, and “guess/thinking” usages are not related to the speaker’s background information, while “guess by evidence”, “dubitative”, and “assertion” usages are related to the speaker’s background information.
(3) The “utagai(dubitative)” usage of the previous researches has been divided into “interrogative +(no)darouka”, “guess/thinking”, “guess by evidence”, and “dubitative” usages; in particular, as for the “guess by evidence” and “dubitative” usages, I have proposed that “A” is the “guess by evidence” usage, and “B” is the “dubitative” usage in a situation content “～A kadouka (=B)”.
(4) I have also proposed that the “(no)darouka” construction has gradable readings, from the “inquiring” usage that means that the speaker has no background information to “a rhetorical question” that has the meaning of a strongassertion.
(1) The “cannot form a judgment” analysis of the previous researches has been divided into “inquiring”, “interrogative+(no)darouka”, and “guess/thinking” usages; the “epistemic modality” analysis of the previous researches has been divided into “guess by evidence”, “dubitative”, and “assertion” usages.
(2) The viewpoint of this paper, i.e. How is the speaker’s epistemic judgment on “situation content” under a certain background information of the speaker?, has made it possible to provide a gradable and unified analysis such that “inquiring”, “interrogative+(no)darouka”, and “guess/thinking” usages are not related to the speaker’s background information, while “guess by evidence”, “dubitative”, and “assertion” usages are related to the speaker’s background information.
(3) The “utagai(dubitative)” usage of the previous researches has been divided into “interrogative +(no)darouka”, “guess/thinking”, “guess by evidence”, and “dubitative” usages; in particular, as for the “guess by evidence” and “dubitative” usages, I have proposed that “A” is the “guess by evidence” usage, and “B” is the “dubitative” usage in a situation content “～A kadouka (=B)”.
(4) I have also proposed that the “(no)darouka” construction has gradable readings, from the “inquiring” usage that means that the speaker has no background information to “a rhetorical question” that has the meaning of a strongassertion.
목차
Abstract
1. はじめに
2. 先行?究
3. 事態?容に?する話し手の認識的判?との?わり
4. まとめ
?考文?
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
文の事態内容に対する話し手の認識的判断とモダリティ副詞の研究 : 蓋然性の高い「必ず」「きっと」「絶対に」「間違いなく」を話し手情報の観点から
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2017 .11
-
推測のモダリティ副詞「たぶん」「おそらく」「さぞ」「おおかた」についての一考察 - 文の事態内容に対する話し手の認識的判断と話し手情報の観点から-
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2020 .11
-
推定のモダリティ副詞と文の事態内容に対する話し手の認識的判断 -「どうも」「どうやら」「よほど(よっぽど)」を話し手情報の観点から-
일어일문학
2019 .11
-
文の事態内容に対する話し手の認識的判断とモダリティ副詞の研究 : 蓋然性の高い「必ず」「きっと」「絶対に」「間違いなく」を話し手情報の観点から
일어일문학
2018 .02
-
場所の助詞「に」と「で」の誤用の原因の分析 : アンケ-ト調査の結果をもとに
일어일문학
2018 .08
-
日本語のYouTubeコメントに見られる正?化ストラテジ? ― 「フェミニズム」に?する否定的なコメントを例に ―
日本語敎育
2020 .01
-
싸리속(Lespedeza Michx.) 식물의 문화적 위치에 대한 한일 비교연구
비교민속학
2024 .10
-
한국 대학생의 한일관계와 대일외교방향에 대한 인식조사
일본문화연구
2017 .01
-
《现代汉语词典》第6版对第5版、第4版的错误订正与存疑
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
韓国語を母語とする日本語学習者の読解における推測ストラテジー
일본어학연구
2021 .12
-
이이다(飯田)인형극제 유대와 명맥(命脈)
동아시아고대학
2020 .01
-
명치시대 지식인들의 조선인식 : 「연대」와「멸시」의 갈등 속에서
일본문화학보
2016 .02
-
「するのか」·「するの?」·「する?」의 기능 재분석 : 《疑い》와《質問》에 초점을 두고
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
어휘 사이즈 평가에서 “모름” 선택지의 역할
현대영어영문학
2023 .02
-
『야부노나카』 소고찰(2) : 『기요미즈데라에 온 여자의 참회』 단락에서 보는 마사고의 사랑
일본문화연구
2015 .10
-
L1일본어모어화자의 추량･양태표현의 습득에 관한 연구 -일본인 유아의 「ようだ・みたいだ」의 습득과정에 주목하여-
日本語敎育
2024 .09
-
从语义地图看汉语多功能词“什么”
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2017 .06
-
1948년 '한글전용에 관한 법률' 검토 -한글전용과 한자혼용을 둘러싼 정부 네트워크의 인식을 중심으로-
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
言いさしのくり返し?話に?する考察 - 言い切りのくり返し?話との比較を中心に -
일본어문학
2021 .11
-
‘On’ Usage across Native Speakers and Korean Learners of English
신영어영문학
2025 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-001286698