지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (10)
2020
2019
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I put forth an analysis of Japanese guess adverbs “tabun”, “osoraku”, “sazo” and “ookata” with respect to the contextual information and the speaker’s background information. It is shown, as stated below, that the four adverbs have gradations of meaning depending on the levels of the speaker’s information.
1) “Tabun” co-occurs almost 50% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 75%) rather than where there is (about 25%). “Tabun” can be used in any stage of judgment, from the cases directly related to the speaker himself to the cases that can only be understood using their imagination or assumption, and suggests the speaker’s will, assertion and guess.
2) “Osoraku” co-occurs almost 60% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 67%) rather than where there is (about 33%). “Osoraku” can be used in any stage of judgment, from the cases directly related to the speaker himself to the cases that can only be understood using their imagination or assumption, and suggests the speaker’s will, plan, conviction and guess.
3) “Sazo” co-occurs almost 94% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 60%) rather than where there is (about 40%). “Sazo” can be used in both the cases that can be related to the feelings of the listener (52% (26/50)) and the cases that can not be related to the feelings of the listener (48% (24/50)), and suggests the meaning of empathy and guessing, regardless of the presence or absence of the speaker’s information.
4) “Ookata” co-occurs almost 90% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 53%) rather than where there is (about 47%). In the context that is not directly related to the speaker or listener, “ookata” mainly has the meaning of guessing in the form of “ookata~darou”.
1) “Tabun” co-occurs almost 50% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 75%) rather than where there is (about 25%). “Tabun” can be used in any stage of judgment, from the cases directly related to the speaker himself to the cases that can only be understood using their imagination or assumption, and suggests the speaker’s will, assertion and guess.
2) “Osoraku” co-occurs almost 60% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 67%) rather than where there is (about 33%). “Osoraku” can be used in any stage of judgment, from the cases directly related to the speaker himself to the cases that can only be understood using their imagination or assumption, and suggests the speaker’s will, plan, conviction and guess.
3) “Sazo” co-occurs almost 94% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 60%) rather than where there is (about 40%). “Sazo” can be used in both the cases that can be related to the feelings of the listener (52% (26/50)) and the cases that can not be related to the feelings of the listener (48% (24/50)), and suggests the meaning of empathy and guessing, regardless of the presence or absence of the speaker’s information.
4) “Ookata” co-occurs almost 90% of the time with the sentence ending form of the "darou" type, and is more often used where there is not the speaker’s information based on contextual evidence (about 53%) rather than where there is (about 47%). In the context that is not directly related to the speaker or listener, “ookata” mainly has the meaning of guessing in the form of “ookata~darou”.
목차
Abstract
1. はじめに
2. 先行研究
3. 推測のモダリティ副詞と文の事態内容に対する話し手の認識的判断
4. まとめ
参考文献
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-830-000083598