메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국체육교육학회 한국체육교육학회지 한국체육교육학회지 제6권 제1호
발행연도
2001.9
수록면
16 - 30 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of portfolio assessment on physical education learning in high school, portfolio assessment groups and traditional assessment groups were compared out of factors such as ALT/PE, learning attitude, cognitive thinking capacity, and the change cf learning achievement for motor function. 1. Academic learning time in physical education Portfolio assessment groups took part in 17 munite 2 second, 341.07% of whole learning time. Therefore motor engaged time took part in more portfolio assessment groups than traditional assessment groups. 2. Learning attitude 1) Physical education class In portfoio assessment groups affirmative attitude has changed out of factors such as interest, importance, enjoyment, monotony, positiveness, and satisfaction degree. However traditional assessment groups has not. 2) Friendship relation Affirmative attitude has changed out of factors such as relationship and sociability of friendship relation in portfolio assessment groups but in traditional assessment groups it has changed out of factors such as relationship of friendship relation. 3) Physical educator Affirmative attitude has changed out of factors such as fairness, preference, and sincerity of physical educator in portfolio assessment groups, while in traditional assessment groups it has changed out of factors such as fairness and preference of physical educator. 3. Cognitive thinking capacity Cognitive thinking capacity revealed high more portfolio assessment groups than traditional asessment groups. 4. Learning achievement for motor function Learning achievement for motor function revealed a little high more portfolio assessment groups than traditional assessment groups

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-370-002762550