지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 221 - 240 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of the securitization of beneficiary right. For this, the attitude survey has been conducted for those who were in charge of real estate evelopment projects in related companies. From the survey, it has been analyzed because beneficiary rights are not effective unless development companies register through trust system. In other words, development companies are in the significant position for trust and securitization. The survey has been conducted through questionnaire.
As a result of the study, it has been clear that a beneficiary right was characteristics of bonds in legal perspective, and that it could be transferred and therefore securitized. Besides, it has been proposed to revise the current related laws.
In addition, the reasons that it is difficult to securitize beneficiary right are the followings: First, no market exists for circulation. Second, the lack of recognition for the securitization of beneficiary certificate spreads. Finally, many people allege that the securitization of beneficiary certificates cannot be basic assets for securitization.
Regarding the feasibility of securitization of beneficiary right and essential matters for the purpose of this study, the following are concluded : First, it would be necessary to form the market, in which q beneficiary right could be distributed. Second, it would be needed to establish legal grounds for securities. Third, most of all, it would be required to set up a credit reinforcement system for the protection of investors.
Based on the results of this study, the securitization of beneficiary right could enhance the potentials to raise more capital for development companies and to increase stable funding to the whole real estate market. It would be required to improve the system for the securitization of beneficiary right and would be inevitable for the securitization of beneficiary right to arrange concrete and practical plans.
As a result of the study, it has been clear that a beneficiary right was characteristics of bonds in legal perspective, and that it could be transferred and therefore securitized. Besides, it has been proposed to revise the current related laws.
In addition, the reasons that it is difficult to securitize beneficiary right are the followings: First, no market exists for circulation. Second, the lack of recognition for the securitization of beneficiary certificate spreads. Finally, many people allege that the securitization of beneficiary certificates cannot be basic assets for securitization.
Regarding the feasibility of securitization of beneficiary right and essential matters for the purpose of this study, the following are concluded : First, it would be necessary to form the market, in which q beneficiary right could be distributed. Second, it would be needed to establish legal grounds for securities. Third, most of all, it would be required to set up a credit reinforcement system for the protection of investors.
Based on the results of this study, the securitization of beneficiary right could enhance the potentials to raise more capital for development companies and to increase stable funding to the whole real estate market. It would be required to improve the system for the securitization of beneficiary right and would be inevitable for the securitization of beneficiary right to arrange concrete and practical plans.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 수익권의 유동화
Ⅲ. 설문설계 및 가설의 설정
Ⅳ. 개발신탁수익권의 유동화에 관한 인식 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
부동산개발신탁수익권의 유동화에 대한 시공회사의 인식
한국지역개발학회지
2008 .12
-
부동산개발신탁사업에 있어 신탁수익권증서의 활용을 통한 자금조달방안에 관한 연구
주거환경
2007 .12
-
자산유동화의 대상자산의 확대
재산법연구
2006 .01
-
자산유동화법에 의한 자산유동화의 한계와 이를 극복하기 위한 수단으로서의 비정형유동화에 관한 고찰
증권법연구
2003 .06
-
지식재산권의 신탁과 유동화 방안
증권법연구
2006 .12
-
A Study on the Second Beneficiary’s Legal Position under Transferred Letter of Credit
무역연구
2013 .01
-
자본시장법상 투자신탁 수익자총회의 문제점 검토
법과 정책연구
2011 .01
-
신탁수익증권을 통한 부동산개발사업의 자금조달방안
증권법연구
2015 .12
-
신탁상 발생한 비용의 배분 : 서울고등법원 2012.2.2. 선고 2010나84835 판결을 계기로
비교사법
2012 .05
-
유동화에 따른 신탁재산의 독자성에 관한 소고
증권법연구
2006 .12
-
부동산담보신탁상 우선수익권의 법적 성질 : 물권 · 채권 준별론으로부터의 외유(外遊) : 대법원 2017. 6. 22. 선고 2014다225809 전원합의체 판결
법학평론
2019 .04
-
수익권 포기의 개념, 절차 및 비용보상책임에 대한 효과: 신탁종료시의 포기를 중심으로
홍익법학
2012 .01
-
수익증권발행신탁의 법률적 문제와 해결과제 : 신탁법과 자본시장법을 중심으로
주거환경
2015 .12
-
유동화 금융자산의 양도와 과세
조세학술논집
2010 .08
-
신탁수익권의 집행에 관한 법적 소고
홍익법학
2014 .01
-
중국의 자산유동화세제에 관한 연구
조세학술논집
2012 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-595-001394266