지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A Shareholder’s derivative action is a suit in which the shareholder sues “on behalf” of the corporation, on the theory that the corporation has been injured by the wrongdoing of a third person, typically director is the corporation. When a minority shareholder in a corporation believes that the board of directors is improperly failing to sue against its directors on a corparate cause of action, he may be able to bring a derivative action. I have reviewed and analyzed below legal issues in the forcible execution.
This research is study on execution proceedings of the court-approved settlement of Shareholder’s Derivative Action, which is increasing recently.
A plaintiff in the derivative action(Share holder), would it be possible for motion execution proceedings irrespective of a Corporation(real right)?
An answer of this question is a wide gap between the two views. The one is an opinion of possibility and the other is impossibility.
The opinion of impossibility is based on the right of bring an judgment to fruition is not Shareholder but Corporation which is right of a substantial law When a plaintiff wins a lawsuit in Derivative Action. But the other’s opinion of possibility is based on the written Shareholder as the parties to a suit(the decision) is the parties in execution proceedings.
Execution proceedings is an underlying principle which performed for a party who represented in the decision. Accordingly, share holder represented in the decision motion application of the execution as a party.
In conclusion, some legal issues were written based on theological basis not judicial precedents since there few precedents in this areas. this study pursue forcible execution into questions in a number of situations. this study is written in the hope of attemting to contribute these discussion.
This research is study on execution proceedings of the court-approved settlement of Shareholder’s Derivative Action, which is increasing recently.
A plaintiff in the derivative action(Share holder), would it be possible for motion execution proceedings irrespective of a Corporation(real right)?
An answer of this question is a wide gap between the two views. The one is an opinion of possibility and the other is impossibility.
The opinion of impossibility is based on the right of bring an judgment to fruition is not Shareholder but Corporation which is right of a substantial law When a plaintiff wins a lawsuit in Derivative Action. But the other’s opinion of possibility is based on the written Shareholder as the parties to a suit(the decision) is the parties in execution proceedings.
Execution proceedings is an underlying principle which performed for a party who represented in the decision. Accordingly, share holder represented in the decision motion application of the execution as a party.
In conclusion, some legal issues were written based on theological basis not judicial precedents since there few precedents in this areas. this study pursue forcible execution into questions in a number of situations. this study is written in the hope of attemting to contribute these discussion.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 승소주주에 의한 강제집행신청
Ⅲ. 승소주주에 의한 강제집행의 방법
Ⅳ. 회사 및 다른 주주에 의한 강제집행신청
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
주주대표소송상 화해와 강제집행에 대한 소고
법학연구
2008 .12
-
미국 회사법상의 주주대표소송과 특별소송위원회에 관한 연구
외법논집
2011 .01
-
株主代表訴訟의 活性化 方案에 관한 考察
경영법률
2008 .01
-
주주대표소송에서 회사의 소송법상 지위
법학연구
2009 .06
-
中國 會社法上 株主代表訴訟制度에 관한 考察
중국법연구
2008 .01
-
沿革으로 본 東北亞 韓·日·中 3國의 株主代表訴訟
동북아법연구
2010 .01
-
주주대표소송 판례의 동향과 그 연구
법학연구
2007 .08
-
二重代表訴訟制度에 관한 法的 考察
경영법률
2008 .01
-
주주대표소송 활성화를 위한 법적과제
기업법연구
2013 .12
-
외상투자기업에서의 주주대표소송 쟁점 및 과제
중국법연구
2015 .01
-
代表訴訟에 있어서 會社의 被告理事側에 補助參加
기업법연구
2004 .12
-
지배회사 주주의 종속회사 이사 등에 대한 이중대표소송 허용에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2009 .09
-
日本会社法における株主代表訴訟の改善方案
법과기업연구
2016 .12
-
주주대표소송에서 회사의 소송참가
원광법학
2009 .01
-
株主代表訴訟의 原告適格에 관한 爭點事項 檢討
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
상법상 이중대표소송 도입의 필요성에 대한 검토
법학연구
2015 .03
-
회사 경영진의 부정행위에 대한 주주의 책임추궁에 대한 고찰 : 한국 · 미국 · 독일의 주주대표소송을 중심으로
기업법연구
2017 .03
-
대표소송의 주체
법학연구
2015 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498626