지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are two types in working the patented invention that joint owners own patent right. One is working by each of joint owners and the other is working by licensee. These workings by each of joint owners or licensee are provided in Korea Patent Act Art. 99(3) & (4).
Korea Patent Act Art 99(3) provides that where a patent right is jointly owned and unless otherwise agreed in a contract of the owners, an owner may individually work the patented invention without the consent of the other joint owners. According to this Act , one of the joint owners does not need the consent of the other joint owners in working the patented invention. However there is an conflict whether the joint owner must account to the other joint owners where the joint owner obtained profit through working the patented invention. That is the reason why there is no provision with regard to accounting to the other joint owners in Korea Patent Act.
Also Korea Patent Act 99(4) provides that where a patent right is jointly owned, an owner may not grant an exclusive license or a non??exclusive license of the patent right without the consent of the other joint owners. Also in this case, Korea Patent Act provides that one of joint owners needs the consent of the other joint owners in order to grant license for the third part, but Korea Patent Act has no provision with regard to accounting to the other joint owners.
Accordingly, this paper wants to interpret whether or not the joint owner who obtained profit through working the patented invention must account to the other joint owners. Addition to this interpretation, this paper also wants to judge whether or not it is desirable that the joint owner must account to the other joint owners. Based on the above, this paper suggests amendment of the Patent Act.
Korea Patent Act Art 99(3) provides that where a patent right is jointly owned and unless otherwise agreed in a contract of the owners, an owner may individually work the patented invention without the consent of the other joint owners. According to this Act , one of the joint owners does not need the consent of the other joint owners in working the patented invention. However there is an conflict whether the joint owner must account to the other joint owners where the joint owner obtained profit through working the patented invention. That is the reason why there is no provision with regard to accounting to the other joint owners in Korea Patent Act.
Also Korea Patent Act 99(4) provides that where a patent right is jointly owned, an owner may not grant an exclusive license or a non??exclusive license of the patent right without the consent of the other joint owners. Also in this case, Korea Patent Act provides that one of joint owners needs the consent of the other joint owners in order to grant license for the third part, but Korea Patent Act has no provision with regard to accounting to the other joint owners.
Accordingly, this paper wants to interpret whether or not the joint owner who obtained profit through working the patented invention must account to the other joint owners. Addition to this interpretation, this paper also wants to judge whether or not it is desirable that the joint owner must account to the other joint owners. Based on the above, this paper suggests amendment of the Patent Act.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공유 특허권에 관한 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 공유 특허권의 실시와 이익분배 책임
Ⅳ. 외국의 입법례
Ⅴ. 특허법 개정안의 제안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
특허권 공유의 성립 및 법적성질과 관련된 제문제
중앙법학
2009 .10
-
특허권에 대한 분할청구 인정 여부 : 대법원 2014. 8. 20. 선고 2013다41578 판결을 중심으로
지식재산연구
2015 .06
-
관계지향적 리더십이 임파워먼트, 관계품질 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 : 중식당 소유주와 지배인 간의 관계를 중심으로
관광레저연구
2005 .11
-
공동발명자 인정기준의 법제화 방안
법학연구
2020 .09
-
관계지향적 리더십이 관계품질, 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 : 중식당 소유주와 지배인 간의 관계를 중심으로
관광연구저널
2005 .12
-
특허의 경제적 수명의 결정요인에 관한 연구 : 갱신자료를 활용한 생존분석
지식경영연구
2010 .01
-
러시아연방 특허법 고찰
외법논집
2007 .01
-
후출원 특허발명을 확인대상으로 하는 권리범위확인심판
과학기술법연구
2015 .01
-
특허침해항변사유로서 묵시적 실시권 (Implied license)에 관한 연구 : 미국사례를 중심으로
지식재산연구
2008 .06
-
지식흐름과 기술혁신에 있어서 특허정보의 역할
과학기술법연구
2011 .01
-
국내 및 해외 특허 분석 시스템 개발 동향에 대한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2011 .05
-
공동발명의 법적 문제점에 대한 고찰
지식재산연구
2015 .03
-
특허소송제도와 활성화에 관한 검토
법과정책
2018 .01
-
특허발명에 있어서의 이용발명과 균등론
기업법연구
2009 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000583657