지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.12
- 수록면
- 691 - 707 (17page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The most important factor that made English renaissance revenge tragedy so popular at that time was not only the sensational violence and bloodshed on the stage but also its representation of the chaotic political and religious problems in the late Tudor Dynasty. People in the Tudor and Stuart Dynasty wanted effective government and religious stability, but they were not achieved. The contemporary dramatists criticized and mocked the chaotic political and social condition, using the setting of other countries, and satisfied the audience’s subversive desire. Revenge tragedy was the most effective means to deliver this political desire by characterizing the immorality of the ruling class and by maximizing the revenger’s suffering. Even though the revengers cannot avoid the destruction, their subversive madness and mockery could give off Dionysiac desire and pleasure beyond moral order.
When we see the renaissance revenge tragedy in the perspective of Christianity, revenge tragedy can be interpreted within the God-centered conservative view. The Christian belief at that time prohibited private revenge. The protagonist of the renaissance revenge tragedy feels conflict between the private revenge and God’s providence. If he gives up his private revenge and depends on God’s justice and law of the country, he does not get the tragic end. However, if he commits private revenge, he cannot but undergo the destruction. Based on this view, revenge tragedy can be the good means to deliver the moral lesson, which emphasizes God's providence and justice ahead the revenger’s desire and emotion.
However, renaissance revenge tragedy reveals the subversive desire which makes the God-centered morals and ruling order suspicious. The revenger is portrayed as a hero. He is not just the incarnation of revenge but the hero who reveals the reality of the corrupt power. The revenger’s painful choice and private revenge involve the political meaning that suspects and criticize God’s or the king’s justice. When the king and the law are not able to take the role of carrying out justice, the revenger’s private vengeance and destruction becomes the good means to bring the audience into the political recognition of social injustice.
When we see the renaissance revenge tragedy in the perspective of Christianity, revenge tragedy can be interpreted within the God-centered conservative view. The Christian belief at that time prohibited private revenge. The protagonist of the renaissance revenge tragedy feels conflict between the private revenge and God’s providence. If he gives up his private revenge and depends on God’s justice and law of the country, he does not get the tragic end. However, if he commits private revenge, he cannot but undergo the destruction. Based on this view, revenge tragedy can be the good means to deliver the moral lesson, which emphasizes God's providence and justice ahead the revenger’s desire and emotion.
However, renaissance revenge tragedy reveals the subversive desire which makes the God-centered morals and ruling order suspicious. The revenger is portrayed as a hero. He is not just the incarnation of revenge but the hero who reveals the reality of the corrupt power. The revenger’s painful choice and private revenge involve the political meaning that suspects and criticize God’s or the king’s justice. When the king and the law are not able to take the role of carrying out justice, the revenger’s private vengeance and destruction becomes the good means to bring the audience into the political recognition of social injustice.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Bowers, Fredson Thayer / 1959 / Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642 / Peter Smith
2. [단행본] - Bradley, A. C / 1968 / Shakespearean Tragedy / Fawcett P
3. [단행본] - Bright, Timothy / 1586 / A Treatise of Melancholy / John Windet
4. [단행본] - Clark, Sandra / 2007 / Renaissance Drama / Polity
5. [단행본] - Dollimore, Jonathan / 1984 / Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries / The Harvester
2. [단행본] - Bradley, A. C / 1968 / Shakespearean Tragedy / Fawcett P
3. [단행본] - Bright, Timothy / 1586 / A Treatise of Melancholy / John Windet
4. [단행본] - Clark, Sandra / 2007 / Renaissance Drama / Polity
5. [단행본] - Dollimore, Jonathan / 1984 / Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries / The Harvester
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Revenge Tradition and Dramatic Form in The Revenger's Tragedy
새한영어영문학
1993 .10
-
『복수자의 비극』—조롱과 환멸의 정치학
영어영문학21
2011 .01
-
『스페인의 비극』(The Spanish Tragedy)에 나타난 복수의 명분
Shakespeare Review
2010 .06
-
『햄릿』 : 분열된 욕망과 복수의 정치학
Shakespeare Review
2011 .06
-
『햄릿』과 『복수자의 비극』에 나타난 여성의 성(sexuality)
Shakespeare Review
2010 .09
-
분노, 복수, 복수 비극의 역사
서양고전학연구
2011 .09
-
The Spanish Tragedy에 나타난 복수와 정의
새한영어영문학
1996 .10
-
고대 중국의 ‘복수’ 관념과 그 문학적 표현
민족문화연구
2014 .01
-
한국 고대의 복수관(復讐觀)과 그 변화
역사와현실
2013 .06
-
철의 시대 : '복수자의 비극'에서 궁정의 타락상
고전 르네상스 영문학
2003 .01
-
『스페인 비극』에 내재된 정치적 아이러니
고전 르네상스 영문학
2010 .01
-
복수(復讎)의 서사로 읽는 영웅소설 : 〈유충렬전〉과 〈조웅전〉을 중심으로
국어국문학
2019 .03
-
『햄릿』에서의 복수의 불가능성과 경제적 무의식
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
先秦시기 복수의 인문화 양상
중국문학
2015 .01
-
『복수자의 비극 The Revenger's Tragedy』의 정신분석학적 접근
세계문학비교연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『햄릿』에 나타난 르네상스 개인주의
한정이
Shakespeare Review
2010
.09
『햄릿』 : 분열된 욕망과 복수의 정치학
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2011
.06
『햄릿』과 『복수자의 비극』에 나타난 여성의 성(sexuality)
이혜경
Shakespeare Review
2010
.09
르네상스 극에서 사적 공간과 자아의 발전 : 『햄릿』의 경우
박우수
Shakespeare Review
2002
.06
햄릿의 젠더 미스터리 : 아스타 닐슨의 〈햄릿 : 복수극〉
김용태
Shakespeare Review
2007
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-840-004311989