지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.6
- 수록면
- 225 - 251 (27page)
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The political meaning of Hamlet’s revenge can be interpreted by completely different perspectives. If his revenge is mirrored in the conservative view of Christian doctrine, we can find the suffering and destruction of the revenger who violates God’s will, and the recognition of God’s providence and the restoration of moral order. Especially, his destruction seems to be inevitable because Hamlet himself becomes the object of revenge after he kills Polonius by mistake. However, if we focus on the cynicism and resistance of the established order which Claudius represents, Hamlet’s revenge can be read as a political text which conveys the subversive desire and the skepticism of the unjustly twisted ruling order.
This complicated and split political meaning is ironically enforced by the division of Hamlet’s inner desire. On the one hand Hamlet is obsessed by the desire for revenge, and on the other hand he is obsessed by the desire to flee from the revenge. Hamlet’s dependence on “readiness” in the last Act reflects more serious political perception. If he has the conviction that his revenge against Claudius can change the Danish society, Hamlet’s revenge represents the subversive desire against the established order. But, if it is impossible, his revenge is just the repetition of the existing order. In Act 5, he knows about the truth of Claudius’ crime, but he doesn’t show the vengefulness any more. This disinterested attitude paradoxically speaks of the difficulty of changing the ruling order “out of joint.”
This complicated and split political meaning is ironically enforced by the division of Hamlet’s inner desire. On the one hand Hamlet is obsessed by the desire for revenge, and on the other hand he is obsessed by the desire to flee from the revenge. Hamlet’s dependence on “readiness” in the last Act reflects more serious political perception. If he has the conviction that his revenge against Claudius can change the Danish society, Hamlet’s revenge represents the subversive desire against the established order. But, if it is impossible, his revenge is just the repetition of the existing order. In Act 5, he knows about the truth of Claudius’ crime, but he doesn’t show the vengefulness any more. This disinterested attitude paradoxically speaks of the difficulty of changing the ruling order “out of joint.”
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-000474790