지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.9
- 수록면
- 587 - 608 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Revenge tragedy, a subdivision of Renaissance tragedy of blood, expresses a dominantly male perspective. In Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy, not only Hamlet but Vindice, as the chief moral spokesman in each play, tells us more about his own needs to set right a world out of joint and epitomizes the aesthetic revenger. The fundamental motive for the tragic action in both plays is revenge according to the masculine code of male domination, yet the revenge motif would be yielded to a psychological development and a detailed study of female sexuality. Shakespeare and Tourneur make explicit the preoccupation with the uncontrollability of female sexuality in their works, for female erotic mobility threatens the power base of patriarchy. The table of incest, adultery, suspicion, hate, and violence explores the boundaries of human corruption in which desire and vengeance have become complicatedly entangled.
Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy effectively demonstrate that women cannot function properly outside of the patriarchal structure, and reinforce the patriarchal notion that women cannot survive without men to govern them. Though each woman is presented as a sexual subject in both plays, questions of chastity, references to chastity, adultery, cuckoldry, incest, and misogyny are submerged in the overpowering issue on her life itself. In both plays each woman is the emotional focus in the play’s cultural construction of the guilt, so that she seems determined to take guilt upon herself. The women who cause the male characters’ anguish or break the rules of female conduct are verbally assaulted by men, or destroyed by the masculine code of the punishment of women.
Despite a moral difference between Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy the woman’s suffering or death is as much an outcome of the tragic hero’s strategy of the actual vengeance, for his frustration or frenzy in the action of revenge is reflected in an attack on female sexuality as a kind of a defense against his vulnerability, specifically against the femininity.
Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy effectively demonstrate that women cannot function properly outside of the patriarchal structure, and reinforce the patriarchal notion that women cannot survive without men to govern them. Though each woman is presented as a sexual subject in both plays, questions of chastity, references to chastity, adultery, cuckoldry, incest, and misogyny are submerged in the overpowering issue on her life itself. In both plays each woman is the emotional focus in the play’s cultural construction of the guilt, so that she seems determined to take guilt upon herself. The women who cause the male characters’ anguish or break the rules of female conduct are verbally assaulted by men, or destroyed by the masculine code of the punishment of women.
Despite a moral difference between Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy the woman’s suffering or death is as much an outcome of the tragic hero’s strategy of the actual vengeance, for his frustration or frenzy in the action of revenge is reflected in an attack on female sexuality as a kind of a defense against his vulnerability, specifically against the femininity.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Beliles, David Buck / 1999 / ‘I am myself indifferent honest’: Hamlet as Ophelia’s Seducer / Hamlet Studies 21 (1) : 77 ~ 88
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bruun, Erik Rosenkrantz / 1993 / ‘As your daughter may conceive’: A Note on the Fair Ophelia / Hamlet Studies 15 (1) : 93 ~ 99
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Coddon, Karin / 1994 / ‘For Show or Useless Property’: Necrophilia and The Revenger’s Tragedy / ELH 61 (1) : 71 ~ 88
4. [단행본] - Deats, Sara Munson / 1991 / From Pedestal to Ditch in The Aching Hearth: Family Violence in Life and Literature / Plenum : 79 ~ 93
5. [단행본] - Foakes, R. A / 1993 / Hamlet versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art / Cambridge UP
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bruun, Erik Rosenkrantz / 1993 / ‘As your daughter may conceive’: A Note on the Fair Ophelia / Hamlet Studies 15 (1) : 93 ~ 99
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Coddon, Karin / 1994 / ‘For Show or Useless Property’: Necrophilia and The Revenger’s Tragedy / ELH 61 (1) : 71 ~ 88
4. [단행본] - Deats, Sara Munson / 1991 / From Pedestal to Ditch in The Aching Hearth: Family Violence in Life and Literature / Plenum : 79 ~ 93
5. [단행본] - Foakes, R. A / 1993 / Hamlet versus Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art / Cambridge UP
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영국 르네상스 복수비극의 전복적 욕망
Shakespeare Review
2010 .12
-
Revenge Tradition and Dramatic Form in The Revenger's Tragedy
새한영어영문학
1993 .10
-
철의 시대 : '복수자의 비극'에서 궁정의 타락상
고전 르네상스 영문학
2003 .01
-
『복수자의 비극 The Revenger's Tragedy』의 정신분석학적 접근
세계문학비교연구
2005 .01
-
『복수자의 비극』—조롱과 환멸의 정치학
영어영문학21
2011 .01
-
『햄릿』 : 분열된 욕망과 복수의 정치학
Shakespeare Review
2011 .06
-
『햄릿』에서의 복수의 불가능성과 경제적 무의식
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
셰익스피어의 4대 비극에 나타난 가부장제와 여성
Shakespeare Review
2000 .06
-
Hamlet, Tragic Hero or Self-indulgence
인문언어
2014 .01
-
복수라는 신화의 이면: 『햄릿』에 나타난 종교개혁 이후의 유령과 복수
고전 르네상스 영문학
2012 .01
-
『햄릿』의 불교적 해석 - 복수와 자아
Shakespeare Review
2000 .03
-
A Critical Examination of the Tragedy of Hamlet
통일인문학
1979 .08
-
『햄릿』과 셰익스피어 비극의 정치성
Shakespeare Review
2006 .12
-
분노, 복수, 복수 비극의 역사
서양고전학연구
2011 .09
-
햄릿의 허무주의
Shakespeare Review
2006 .03
-
Hamlet의 비극적 의미
코기토
1981 .12
-
〈햄릿-디 액터〉의 햄릿 이야기 연출하기
Shakespeare Review
2014 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-840-003887702