메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
미래영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2016.2
수록면
37 - 64 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Hamlet’s dull revenge has provoked an unending critical controversy over centuries, in which many able critics and scholars have assailed one another about the hero’s motive in delaying the work of revenge or the causes of the hero’s inability to do the job. The unavailability of critical agreement on these issues suggests that Hamlet is not to be understood as a revenge play per se. Unlike the heroes of other revenge tragedies, Hamlet shows no strong interests in plotting against his evil enemy. This paper argues that Hamlet succeeds where its hero fails, and that the business of Hamlet is not to present the particulars of revenge but rather to let the audience, as well as the future narrative community anticipated by the hero’s dying words, understand the impossibility of revenge as an act of justice. The economic unconscious is abound in the world of Hamlet, where words are treated as coins, and the whole range of human behavior from feeling and thinking to making relations with another individual is put on the scale of evaluation, thus quantified and arithmetically measured. Signalled by the king’s thrift policy, utility defined by instrumental rationality is the dominant ethos in the state of Denmark, in which the language of market exchange prevails in social commerce and communication, all distinctly marked by profit-oriented motives and thus making common terms of justice impossible.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-740-000701891