지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.12
- 수록면
- 17 - 467 (453page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This pilot project was planned to run for three years, in order to establish Family Conferencing(FC) as part of restorative justice practices as an alternative or diversionary process for addressing school bullying, to elaborate a Training Manual for Family Conferencing(FC) Practitioners which provide practices and guidelines within the context of broader youth justice framework, and to evaluate its effectiveness and its adaptability for managing school violence and bullying problems in schools, furthermore the potential possibility for dealing with young offender who have commit the crimes.
Family Group Conferencing(FGC) Model was first developed in New Zealand, and accepted into their Child and Family legislation in 1989. FGC is now being used in the field of child protection in sites in many parts of the world including Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Netherlands, Israel, Hungary, the Nordic countries and Canada. With each application of the New Zealand model, there have been some variations in how the procedures are finally executed. In developing a framework for this Korean FC Project, there has been an effort to both attempt to integrate the learnings from other projcets, but also to "grow" a project which matches the unique profile of the our community.
In 2006, it's first three years, the research focuses on the following four subjects. Firstly, the report contains the analysis about the state-of-the-art on school violence and the limits and pitfalls in the current policies and government strategies dealing with bullying problems in school, and discusses what should be done and changed to improve the effective responding and to enhance early interventions within the juvenile justice procedures.
Secondly, the report identifies the needs on justice system(or services) of five interested parties groups(teachers, victims, victims' families, offenders, and offenders' families) affected by school violence through the self-reported questionnaire and the depth-interviews, and to suggest the importance of change into restorative justice as "best practices" possible to meet the needs of the interested parties.
Thirdly, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of most recent "restorative justice practices and programs" developed in the several western jurisdictions supporting FC model as a effective means to resolve the conflicts among victims, offenders and their families.
Finally, the report test for FC model's usefulness as a methodology which better enables the participants to have high levels satisfactions and positive feelings with process and outcome, greater likelihood of successful restitution completion by the offender with admitting the responsibility of wrongdoing, and to evaluate the findings and the complements for amending FC procedures more effective, particularly by a pilot study through "role plays" based on four different senarios that specialize in FC process dealing with school violence.
In sum, the final results of this report support the importance of restorative justice paradigm as principles for dealing with school bullying, and demonstrate the adaptability of FC model as a effective measure and work best for school violence from the findings on a pilot study in 2006.
Family Conferencing is a very recent response to youth offending including school violence. Although other jurisdictions have implemented conferencing programs, each legislation is unique depending on socio-cultural contexts. For these reasons, procedures and practices guidelines on our FC model suggested in this report should be subjected to amendment and evaluation in the next years.
Family Group Conferencing(FGC) Model was first developed in New Zealand, and accepted into their Child and Family legislation in 1989. FGC is now being used in the field of child protection in sites in many parts of the world including Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Netherlands, Israel, Hungary, the Nordic countries and Canada. With each application of the New Zealand model, there have been some variations in how the procedures are finally executed. In developing a framework for this Korean FC Project, there has been an effort to both attempt to integrate the learnings from other projcets, but also to "grow" a project which matches the unique profile of the our community.
In 2006, it's first three years, the research focuses on the following four subjects. Firstly, the report contains the analysis about the state-of-the-art on school violence and the limits and pitfalls in the current policies and government strategies dealing with bullying problems in school, and discusses what should be done and changed to improve the effective responding and to enhance early interventions within the juvenile justice procedures.
Secondly, the report identifies the needs on justice system(or services) of five interested parties groups(teachers, victims, victims' families, offenders, and offenders' families) affected by school violence through the self-reported questionnaire and the depth-interviews, and to suggest the importance of change into restorative justice as "best practices" possible to meet the needs of the interested parties.
Thirdly, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of most recent "restorative justice practices and programs" developed in the several western jurisdictions supporting FC model as a effective means to resolve the conflicts among victims, offenders and their families.
Finally, the report test for FC model's usefulness as a methodology which better enables the participants to have high levels satisfactions and positive feelings with process and outcome, greater likelihood of successful restitution completion by the offender with admitting the responsibility of wrongdoing, and to evaluate the findings and the complements for amending FC procedures more effective, particularly by a pilot study through "role plays" based on four different senarios that specialize in FC process dealing with school violence.
In sum, the final results of this report support the importance of restorative justice paradigm as principles for dealing with school bullying, and demonstrate the adaptability of FC model as a effective measure and work best for school violence from the findings on a pilot study in 2006.
Family Conferencing is a very recent response to youth offending including school violence. Although other jurisdictions have implemented conferencing programs, each legislation is unique depending on socio-cultural contexts. For these reasons, procedures and practices guidelines on our FC model suggested in this report should be subjected to amendment and evaluation in the next years.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 학교폭력 대응정책의 현황과 문제점
제3장 사법서비스 욕구조사
제4장 새로운 대응방안으로서 회복적 사법
제5장 회복적 사법모델에 대한 모의실험 결과
제6장 한국형 회복적 사법 모델의 이론과 실천방향
참고문헌
부록 : 설문지
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회복적 소년사법 조정실무가 실행지침
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
[21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제(Ⅱ)] 회복적 소년사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
가정폭력 사건에 대한 새로운 접근 : 유럽의 회복적 정의 실천을 중심으로
국제학논총
2017 .12
-
Restorative Justice Conferencing for Juvenile Offenders
피해자학연구
2005 .01
-
새로운 다이버전으로서 회복적 사법의 실제와 그 효과 : 경찰단계 가족회합 실험연구 결과를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2008 .06
-
Restorative Justice Dialogue : Three Decades of Victim Offender Mediation Practice & Research in the Global Community
교정연구
2007 .01
-
소년사법과 회복적 사법
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
회복적 사법의 개념과 활용가능성에 관한 小考
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
회복적 사법정의 배경, 발전과정, 주요프로그램 그리고 선진교정복지
교정연구
2007 .01
-
범죄피해자와 회복적 사법의 모델
피해자학연구
2005 .01
-
Problems of Bullying and School Violence in Korea
형사정책연구
2000 .03
-
회복적 사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구 : 공식소년절차 참여집단과 ‘대화모임’ 참여집단 간의 비교연구를 중심으로
형사정책연구
2009 .09
-
回復的 司法의 意義와 그 受容可能性
법학연구
2003 .12
-
또래괴롭힘(bullying)의 개념과 법적규율 -학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률과 관련하여-
일감법학
2014 .01
-
범죄피해자보호·지원을 위한 회복적 패러다임의 실천방안
피해자학연구
2008 .01
-
회복적 사법과 우리나라의 형사제재체계
형사법연구
2007 .01
-
보호관찰에서 회복적 사법의 실현방안
교정연구
2015 .01
-
회복적 사법 실천모델에 관한 연구 : 경찰단계 소년범죄를 중심으로
경찰학연구
2013 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003832402