지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Current Criminal Law of Korea was adapted from Japanese Criminal Law in the origin of Continental Law System(especially German Criminal Law). So in the definition and interpretation about the Criminal Law was dominated the dogmatics of Japanese and German Criminal Law. But in the Chosun Dynasty there was a good and systematic Criminal Law in the origin of Chinese Criminal Law(Daemyoungrul).
The characteristics of Chosun Criminal Law was found in the so concrete and particular provisions about crime and the penalty as to give the judge no free discretion in judgement, and it laid importance on the objective result of the offence rather than on the subjective will or intention of the offender. The Chosun Dynasty was based on the birth class system, so it was thought natural that any similar offences should have deserved different penalties according to the differences of the social classes to which offenders, the offended or the owners of the objects of offences belonged. This is the main characteristics of the Chosun Criminal Law as compared to the Current Criminal Law, but it had also some theoretical aspects almost as much developed as that of the modern one. For instance, all the offences in Chosun Criminal Law were put into two categories,
intentional and accidental, and the criminal categories of the offenders were so stipulate that those over seventy and under fifteen and those over eighty and under ten sere respectively under the criminal responsibilities from the rest, and those with diseases or vital ailments were respectively reconsidered to some extent out of the regular criminal responsibility.
The regular criminal punishments of Chosun Dynasty were composed of the five types - lashing, flogging, imprisonment with hard labour, banishment and death penalty. Besides these were the supplementary punishments of tattoo and dismissal. In the Chosun Dynasty, there existed no separation of three powers but the King hand the whole three power - the legislative, the executive, and the judicature - at his command. Therefore no independent organization of justice was established, and executive officials performed the role of judges and prosecutors, because judicial judgements were not recognised as judicial measures but as part of the executive functions.
The contents of this article consists of followings.
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Adaptation of the Chinese Criminal Codes (Daemyoungryul) in the early Chosun Dynasty
Ⅲ. The General Clauses about Crime and Punishment in the Daemyoungryul
Ⅳ. The Conflict between the Daemyoungryul and the Customary Chosun Law and the Enactment of the Exception Clauses.
The characteristics of Chosun Criminal Law was found in the so concrete and particular provisions about crime and the penalty as to give the judge no free discretion in judgement, and it laid importance on the objective result of the offence rather than on the subjective will or intention of the offender. The Chosun Dynasty was based on the birth class system, so it was thought natural that any similar offences should have deserved different penalties according to the differences of the social classes to which offenders, the offended or the owners of the objects of offences belonged. This is the main characteristics of the Chosun Criminal Law as compared to the Current Criminal Law, but it had also some theoretical aspects almost as much developed as that of the modern one. For instance, all the offences in Chosun Criminal Law were put into two categories,
intentional and accidental, and the criminal categories of the offenders were so stipulate that those over seventy and under fifteen and those over eighty and under ten sere respectively under the criminal responsibilities from the rest, and those with diseases or vital ailments were respectively reconsidered to some extent out of the regular criminal responsibility.
The regular criminal punishments of Chosun Dynasty were composed of the five types - lashing, flogging, imprisonment with hard labour, banishment and death penalty. Besides these were the supplementary punishments of tattoo and dismissal. In the Chosun Dynasty, there existed no separation of three powers but the King hand the whole three power - the legislative, the executive, and the judicature - at his command. Therefore no independent organization of justice was established, and executive officials performed the role of judges and prosecutors, because judicial judgements were not recognised as judicial measures but as part of the executive functions.
The contents of this article consists of followings.
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Adaptation of the Chinese Criminal Codes (Daemyoungryul) in the early Chosun Dynasty
Ⅲ. The General Clauses about Crime and Punishment in the Daemyoungryul
Ⅳ. The Conflict between the Daemyoungryul and the Customary Chosun Law and the Enactment of the Exception Clauses.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 朝鮮朝刑事法源으로서의 大明律의 繼受
Ⅲ. 大明律直解上의 刑法總則的規定
Ⅳ. 大明律과 傳統法의 衝突및 例外規定의 生成
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
사회변동과 형법의 과제
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
한국형법 개정의 올바른 방향 -형법총칙을 중심으로-
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
[형사특별법 정비방안(9)] 금융/재정/노동/사회풍속 분야
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
한국 형법의 개혁과 발전
동아법학
2007 .02
-
군형법 제정의 역사적 배경과 관련 문제점
군사
2012 .03
-
일본개정형법가안이 제정형법에 미친 영향과 현행 형법해석론의 문제점
형사법연구
2003 .01
-
범죄피해자 보호제도에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
형사특별법 정비방안(4) 특정경제범죄가중처벌법등에관한법률
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
조선형법에 있어서 유추적용의 문제
법학연구
2004 .12
-
형사법의 재정비를 위한 기본적 성찰
동아법학
2005 .12
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [9] : 우리나라 및 주요 국가의 형법개정 동향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
형법의 문화수용 – 결혼목적 약취·유인죄 및 독일의 강제결혼죄를 중심으로
비교형사법연구
2019 .01
-
형사사법절차상 형사합의 관행의 실태분석과 제도화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
국제형법학회(Association Internationale de Droit Pénal : AIDP)의 제14차 세계학술대회(I)
김영환
형사정책연구
1991
.03
刑法改正과 관련하여 본 姦通罪 硏究
申東雲
형사정책연구
1991
.03
搜査警察의 意識에 관한 硏究
李廷洙
형사정책연구
1991
.03
국제형법학회 (Association Internationale de Droit Pénal : AIDP) 의 제 14차 세계학술대회( Ⅱ ) : 1989년 비엔나에서 개최된 제 14차 세계 형법학술대회 결의사항
김영환
형사정책연구
1991
.06
형법개정과 관련하여 본 낙태죄 연구
신동운
형사정책연구
1991
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003957144