지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Virtual World are computer-moderated, persistent environments through and with which multiple individuals may interact simultaneously. Many virtual worlds allow characters within those worlds to buy and sell virtual goods. However the more people who accept an illusion on virtual world, the more it becomes real. Actually, trading in virtual goods already takes place and involves large sums of money.
The local game market amounted to 44,301 million won in 2003, and rise up to 10.1% per year. And the market volume of virtual goods - online game item - was 7,042 million won in 2003. However along with the growth of game industry, the serious social problems such as obscenity, addiction and infringement of virtual property, etc. has arisen from ouline game. Especially, Although illegal sales of game items used on the online game sites and hacking of such items are committed, most players of virtual worlds have little sense of guilt over crimes committed in those worlds. For example, players attempt to hack the game site or swindle items out of other players, they trade the stolen game items through the virtual object trading site.
In these instances, it is questionable whether virtual property can be regarded as an object of property crime in a sense of criminal law. Because most provisions of property crime were created in accordance with tangible property or intangible energy and were not especially designed for virtual property and fot the legal demands of computerized information society.
Online game item as a virtual goods has no tangible substance in a real sense, moreover it cannot be appreciated as a type of intangible energy. Therefore, game item cannot be looked upon as an object of theft, but there is some possibility of comprehending as an advantage and service for the purpose of property crime.
Game item is a part of game program. It is only an additional and independent digital images on game program. For this, online game items in virtual worlds belongs to game service provider, and game user has only some kind of exclusive using right on the contract. That is, advantage and service as an object of property crime can be based on the right of using online game and game items.
Above all, it is required that the criminal law should be amended to cover the specific needs of game items as an object of property crime.
The local game market amounted to 44,301 million won in 2003, and rise up to 10.1% per year. And the market volume of virtual goods - online game item - was 7,042 million won in 2003. However along with the growth of game industry, the serious social problems such as obscenity, addiction and infringement of virtual property, etc. has arisen from ouline game. Especially, Although illegal sales of game items used on the online game sites and hacking of such items are committed, most players of virtual worlds have little sense of guilt over crimes committed in those worlds. For example, players attempt to hack the game site or swindle items out of other players, they trade the stolen game items through the virtual object trading site.
In these instances, it is questionable whether virtual property can be regarded as an object of property crime in a sense of criminal law. Because most provisions of property crime were created in accordance with tangible property or intangible energy and were not especially designed for virtual property and fot the legal demands of computerized information society.
Online game item as a virtual goods has no tangible substance in a real sense, moreover it cannot be appreciated as a type of intangible energy. Therefore, game item cannot be looked upon as an object of theft, but there is some possibility of comprehending as an advantage and service for the purpose of property crime.
Game item is a part of game program. It is only an additional and independent digital images on game program. For this, online game items in virtual worlds belongs to game service provider, and game user has only some kind of exclusive using right on the contract. That is, advantage and service as an object of property crime can be based on the right of using online game and game items.
Above all, it is required that the criminal law should be amended to cover the specific needs of game items as an object of property crime.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 아이템ㆍ사이버머니의 개념 및 범죄유발원인
Ⅲ. 게임 아이템 관련 재산범죄 유형 및 판례의 경향
Ⅳ. 재산죄의 객체로서 전자정보의 포섭가능성에 대한 검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
온라인 게임의 종류와 승패가 게임에 대한 자기통제와 중독에 미치는 영향
인터넷전자상거래연구
2018 .12
-
온라인 게임아이템에 대한 형법적 해석방향
형사정책연구
2011 .12
-
게임 가상물에 대한 이용자의 권리의 법적 성격
원광법학
2011 .01
-
The Study on Optimization of Virtual Presence for Computer-Game Design
[KOCCA] 보고서(ALIO)
2010 .04
-
ITS GAME 2012 in Korea
[KOCCA] 세미나자료
2012 .06
-
게임법의 구조와 체계
중앙법학
2014 .09
-
An Analysis of Virtual Economies in MMORPG(Massively Multi-players in Online Role Playing Game)
국제컨퍼런스 자료집
2007 .01
-
온라인게임 셧다운제의 위헌성여부에 대한 검토
한양법학
2012 .02
-
온라인 게임 아이템 불법취득에 대한 Policing 관점에서의 위험성 고찰
한국경찰연구
2010 .01
-
Virtual Goods and Social Influence : Evidence from the Online Game Industry
한국유통학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .10
-
군사훈련용 기능성 게임에 관한 연구
군사학연구
2009 .01
-
컴퓨터 게임의 법적 문제점에 관한 소고
강원법학
2008 .12
-
온라인 웹보드게임 규제정책과 형사처벌의 한계
중앙법학
2013 .06
-
일본 온라인 게임시장에의 성공적 진출을 위한 기반 연구 : 게이머 유형별 특성 차이를 중심으로
무역상무연구
2005 .05
-
다중게임요소와 단일게임요소에 의한 게임콘텐츠 원가산정 방법에 관한 비교연구
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2008 .03
-
고객 충성도(Customer Loyalty)에 영향을 미치는 온라인 게임의 중요 요소에 대한 LISREL 모델 분석
경영정보학연구
2001 .01
-
온라인게임 규제 법안의 주요 쟁점과 과제
한양법학
2014 .05
-
온라인게임 셧다운제의 헌법적합성에 관한 연구
한림법학 FORUM
2005 .11
-
인터넷 게임아이템 거래에 관한 법리
중앙법학
2003 .12
-
증강 제품인 게임아이템의 지각된 가치와 구매의도가 핵심서비스인 게임 충성도에 미치는 영향
경영교육연구
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968472