개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The publication of the reports on Sanggyeongseong Castle[上京城] and Seogo Castle[西古城] contributed to enhancing the level of studying a step higher on the basis of existing excavation fruits in Old Japan times. Especially, a lot of points of view presented in the reports will be a milestone to understanding the traits of Balhae[渤海] royal palaces. But the recognition revealed here on Balhae royal castles, especially on the genealogy of palaces, have to be examined, compared with the existing studies. It is because discusses on reports were based on the results of the investigation about excavation, but it’s not far from the existing recognition, at the point of view after examination.
They said that the structure of Sanggyeongseong Castle found now is the latest shape, but the structure of the past was the same as that of Seogoseong Castle. From an aspect it seems to be reasonable. But, basically that opinion is set out that the palace1 and palace2 of Sanggyeongseong Castle can not be built without the affection of Tang[唐]. This thesis and the another one written by myself found out that there were more parts that could be compared with the arrangement and structure of Goguryeo[高句麗] Palaces than the parts that could be compared with the arrangement of Tang directly. This thesis could establish a direct genealogy from a central palace building division.
That report intended to restore the expansion courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle through the recognition on soil layer sections of Sanggyeongseong Castle No.3 palace site. But, compared with restoration height of Seogoseong Palace No.1, object of comparison, it has something to considered on. In addition, the control works for setting main sticks and foundations on the upper parts in the course of piling up soils and stones are found from the other archaeological sites such as miruk temple site of Baekje. So, it is necessary to think of the issue in the other aspects.
In the end, referring to the palace sites of Sanggyeongseong Palace No.4 and the palace sites of Seogoseong Palace No.2, this thesis looked into the fact that there were a lot of parts to think of due to something more than only the king’s bedroom[寢殿]. It is because an Assembly hall[講堂] sites of Neungsanri[陵山里] temple Sites[寺址] at Baekje[百濟] periods are found, similar to the structure of the building sites of the palace sites. Now, a lot of discussions are on the progress, in relation to Neungsanrisa Site halls.
So, the roles of Sanggyeongseong Castle and Seogoseong Castle have to be discussed on again. It has to be considered on, together with the structure arrangements of vice-palace and structure and palace sites in the right and left.
This thesis presented the points of view, different from those of the reports, about some parts. There are some possibilities for developed new culture of Tang to be mixed and imported to the building courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle, as time went by . But, it has to be considered on that a lot of parts that Goguryeo’s culture had are found in Sanggyeongseong Castle. It is because the facts are important hints for understanding position and genealogy that Balhae palace has, viewed from the East Asia Castle styles.
They said that the structure of Sanggyeongseong Castle found now is the latest shape, but the structure of the past was the same as that of Seogoseong Castle. From an aspect it seems to be reasonable. But, basically that opinion is set out that the palace1 and palace2 of Sanggyeongseong Castle can not be built without the affection of Tang[唐]. This thesis and the another one written by myself found out that there were more parts that could be compared with the arrangement and structure of Goguryeo[高句麗] Palaces than the parts that could be compared with the arrangement of Tang directly. This thesis could establish a direct genealogy from a central palace building division.
That report intended to restore the expansion courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle through the recognition on soil layer sections of Sanggyeongseong Castle No.3 palace site. But, compared with restoration height of Seogoseong Palace No.1, object of comparison, it has something to considered on. In addition, the control works for setting main sticks and foundations on the upper parts in the course of piling up soils and stones are found from the other archaeological sites such as miruk temple site of Baekje. So, it is necessary to think of the issue in the other aspects.
In the end, referring to the palace sites of Sanggyeongseong Palace No.4 and the palace sites of Seogoseong Palace No.2, this thesis looked into the fact that there were a lot of parts to think of due to something more than only the king’s bedroom[寢殿]. It is because an Assembly hall[講堂] sites of Neungsanri[陵山里] temple Sites[寺址] at Baekje[百濟] periods are found, similar to the structure of the building sites of the palace sites. Now, a lot of discussions are on the progress, in relation to Neungsanrisa Site halls.
So, the roles of Sanggyeongseong Castle and Seogoseong Castle have to be discussed on again. It has to be considered on, together with the structure arrangements of vice-palace and structure and palace sites in the right and left.
This thesis presented the points of view, different from those of the reports, about some parts. There are some possibilities for developed new culture of Tang to be mixed and imported to the building courses of Sanggyeongseong Castle, as time went by . But, it has to be considered on that a lot of parts that Goguryeo’s culture had are found in Sanggyeongseong Castle. It is because the facts are important hints for understanding position and genealogy that Balhae palace has, viewed from the East Asia Castle styles.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 上京城 第1號ㆍ第2號 宮殿址의 系譜
3. 上京城 第3號 宮殿址의 基壇解釋과 西古城의 第1號 宮殿址의 比較
4. 上京城 第4號 宮殿址와 西古城 第2號 宮殿址의 系譜
5. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (5)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
발해 도성의 의례공간과 왕권의 위상
한국고대사연구
2013 .09
-
각 시기별 발해 상경성의 조영 범위와 변화 양상 : 주요궁전건물의 건설 시기를 같이 논함
고구려발해연구
2013 .07
-
서고성의 궁전배치를 통해 본 발해 도성제의 변화
고구려발해연구
2010 .11
-
渤海西古城發掘現況과 그 意義
고구려발해연구
2009 .07
-
고구려 국내성 발굴의 의의
고구려발해연구
2005 .09
-
新羅 月城의 空間構造 認識에 대한 再檢討
史叢(사총)
2010 .01
-
지형 및 유구분포로 본 백제 사비왕궁의 범위
역사와 담론
2011 .12
-
高句麗 安鶴宮 中央 建築群에 대한 考察 -前殿 高臺建築 形制의 채용을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
고려말 성곽 축조와 향촌사회의 동향
역사와경계
2010 .06
-
화전 소밀성과 화룡 서고성의 건축형식 비교연구
고구려발해연구
2009 .07
-
Tennyson’s Poetics of Sorrow in “Mariana” and “The Palace of Art”
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
고려 강도 성곽의 체제와 위치 고찰
동양학
2015 .01
-
러시아 아무르지역 중세시대 성곽의 현황과 특징
고구려발해연구
2014 .03
-
月池宮 관련 자료 재검토 — 東宮은 太子宮이 아니다 —
동양고전연구
2014 .01
-
연해주 발해성곽의 구조와 성격
중앙고고연구
2017 .01
-
百濟 泗沘時期의 都城과 地方都市
지방사와 지방문화
2003 .05
-
백제 熊津王都와 大通寺址
한국사연구
2011 .12
-
역사과 멀티미디어 교수학습자료 개발 - 중세 유럽의 성당과 성채 탐방 -
인문콘텐츠
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002713667