지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 고조선단군학회 고조선단군학 고조선단군학 제22호
- 발행연도
- 2010.5
- 수록면
- 297 - 314 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.18706/jgds.2010.05.22.297
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Samguk yusa and the Qianfu lun were respectively written in Korea and China in the interval of more than a thousand years. Nonetheless, they share a similar understanding on the Old Choson and the Kija state. Both texts mention that as the Old Choson had existed before the migration of Kija, the Kija state began to emerge to the west of the preexisting Old Choson.
The Samguk yusa records that Tangun moved his capital twice to Changdanggyong and Asadal, respectively, during the existence of the Kija state. This signifies the long duration of expanded Old Choson to the east of the Kija state. The Qianfu lun states that the ruling family of the Kija state to the west of the Old Choson received an attack from Wi Man and escaped to the south through the sea route.
Both texts share the same understanding on the Kija state located to the west of the Old Choson. Because Wi Man usurped the rulership of the Kija state and the Wi Man Choson was replaced by the Four Han Commanderies, it goes without saying that both Wi Man Choson and the Four Han commanderies were placed to the west of the Old Choson. The two texts mention that they were all located to the west of the Old Choson.
The Old Choson surely coexisted to the east of the Kija state, Wi Man Choson and the Four Han Commanderies. While the three parties were located in Liaoxi, the Old Choson was placed to the east encompassing Liaodong and the Korean peninsula. Thus, it is reasonable to say that the history of Korean nation followed its main line from the Old Choson to the Multi-state period.
This kind of recognition is completely different from the records of the Jewang ungi, the “Chiriji” of the Koryosa, and the “Chirili” of Sejong silrok, all of which state the fall of the Old Choson before the migration of Kija or with the establishment of the Kija state. It also does not correspond with the current mainstream scheme of the Old Choson, the Wi Man Choson, the Four Han Commanderies and finally the Multi-state period.
That the Samguk yusa of the thirteenth century shares the same understanding on the Old Choson with that of the Qianfu lun of the second century in turn proves the authenticity of the texts.
The only problem in the Qianfu lun is that it names both the Old Choson and the Kija state as Han. This leads us to consider two possibilities: One, Wang Fu, the author of the Qianfu lun, might misunderstand han 汗 or kahan 可汗, the ruler in ancient northeast Asian languages, as a state name. Two, while the early names of the Old Choson varied like Han, Asadal and Choson, it may have been eventually unified into Choson.
The Samguk yusa records that Tangun moved his capital twice to Changdanggyong and Asadal, respectively, during the existence of the Kija state. This signifies the long duration of expanded Old Choson to the east of the Kija state. The Qianfu lun states that the ruling family of the Kija state to the west of the Old Choson received an attack from Wi Man and escaped to the south through the sea route.
Both texts share the same understanding on the Kija state located to the west of the Old Choson. Because Wi Man usurped the rulership of the Kija state and the Wi Man Choson was replaced by the Four Han Commanderies, it goes without saying that both Wi Man Choson and the Four Han commanderies were placed to the west of the Old Choson. The two texts mention that they were all located to the west of the Old Choson.
The Old Choson surely coexisted to the east of the Kija state, Wi Man Choson and the Four Han Commanderies. While the three parties were located in Liaoxi, the Old Choson was placed to the east encompassing Liaodong and the Korean peninsula. Thus, it is reasonable to say that the history of Korean nation followed its main line from the Old Choson to the Multi-state period.
This kind of recognition is completely different from the records of the Jewang ungi, the “Chiriji” of the Koryosa, and the “Chirili” of Sejong silrok, all of which state the fall of the Old Choson before the migration of Kija or with the establishment of the Kija state. It also does not correspond with the current mainstream scheme of the Old Choson, the Wi Man Choson, the Four Han Commanderies and finally the Multi-state period.
That the Samguk yusa of the thirteenth century shares the same understanding on the Old Choson with that of the Qianfu lun of the second century in turn proves the authenticity of the texts.
The only problem in the Qianfu lun is that it names both the Old Choson and the Kija state as Han. This leads us to consider two possibilities: One, Wang Fu, the author of the Qianfu lun, might misunderstand han 汗 or kahan 可汗, the ruler in ancient northeast Asian languages, as a state name. Two, while the early names of the Old Choson varied like Han, Asadal and Choson, it may have been eventually unified into Choson.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 『三國遺事』와 『潛夫論』의 箕子에 관한 기록
Ⅲ. 기자조선, 위만조선, 한사군의 계승관계
Ⅳ. 기자의 신분과 고조선 이주
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고조선 연구의 현황과 과제
고조선단군학
2003 .12
-
古朝鮮과 琵琶形銅劍의 問題
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
고조선의 붕괴 원인
고조선단군학
2010 .11
-
고조선의 실존문제 : 상식적 탐색
고조선단군학
2011 .11
-
한말 일제강점기 민족사학자들의 위만과 위만조선 이해와 서술
역사연구
2017 .12
-
丁應泰의 '朝鮮誣告事件'을 통해 본 조ㆍ명관계
사학연구
2004 .12
-
黃遵憲의 『朝鮮策略』에 나타난 朝鮮自强策과 ‘地域’의식
동양고전연구
2010 .01
-
日帝の朝鮮支配末期における情報ㆍ宣伝政策
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
衛滿朝鮮의 王權과 地方統治體制
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
衛滿朝鮮의 領域과 王儉城
한국고대사연구
2001 .06
-
미국 학계에서의 조선성리학 연구현황
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
한국 중·고등학교 한국사교과서에서 고조선 지명의 비정(比定)에 관하여
고조선단군학
2014 .06
-
조선중화주의의 재검토 : 이론적 접근
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
1937-45년 일제의 戰費調達과 朝鮮銀行卷 發行制度 전환
한국사연구
2004 .12
-
李丙燾의 한국고대사연구와 식민주의사학의 문제 : 《韓國古代史硏究》를 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .03
-
朝鮮時代 賤人身分變動의 諸問題
경주사학
1996 .12
-
조선전기의 司饔院
한국사학보
1998 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002403586