메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임재해 (안동대학교)
저널정보
고조선단군학회 고조선단군학 고조선단군학 제26호
발행연도
2012.5
수록면
277 - 343 (67page)
DOI
10.18706/jgds.2012.05.26.277

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Historic view is borne from historic records. Historic records from Old Joseon demand re-classification of the ancient history. Looking at the two records from Old Joseon including 『Samgukyusa』 ‘Old Joseon Article’ and 『Epic of Emperors and Kings』 ‘Epic of Early Joseon,’ the name of the country founded by Dangun is always described as "Joseon", However, titles of the records use ‘Old Joseon’ and "Early Joseon." According to such titles, the country founded by Dangun is referred to as ‘Old Joseon.’ In the records, Dangun is the progenitor of the ethnic group and Old Joseon is described as the very first country.
‘Old Joseon’ and "Early Joseon" are not the names of country but merely concepts of time created from "Joseon," which is the actual name of country. ‘Old Joseon Article’ has records on Shins hi of Hwan-ung, Joseon of Dangun, and Joseon of Gija. ‘Epic of Early Joseon’ has records on Shindansu of Hwan-ung and Joseon of Dangun. ‘Old Joseon’ is a relative reference to Wiman Joseon and ‘Early Joseon’ is a relative reference to Gija Joseon, which is also known as Late Joseon. Therefore, the term ‘Old Joseon’ originates from 『Samgukvusa』 but has its meaning limited to Joseon of Dangun.
While historic record on ‘Old Joseon’ describes ‘Shinshi of Hwan-ung’ and "Joseon of Dangun," historic material, quantitative weight, and qualitative meaning are all concentrated on Shins hi of Hwan-ung. The concept of humanitarianism, three divine treasures, 360 duties, and ruler of the world based on reason are the traces of Hwan-ung instead of Dangun. Speaking in terms of country name, contents focus on "Shinshi" instead of "Joseon." Accordingly, historic significance of "Old Joseon’ with consideration on the weight of records and country name of "Joseon" can be seen as Shinshi of Hwan-ung, not Dangun Joseon. Hence, "Old Joseon’ is more inclined to Shinshi of Hwan-ung than Joseon of Dangun.
Diachronically, Joseon of Dangun was made possible by Shinshi of Hwan-ung. Logically, "Old Joseon" can only exist because of "Joseon." However in the ancient history, there is no era of "Joseon" founded by Dangiun While substituting "Joseon" by "Old Joseon," Shinshi of Hwan-ung is even excluded from historic descriptions. Therefore, referring to "Joseon" of Dangun as "Old Joseon" is not only a historic and logical contradiction but also a historic distortion that eliminates the history of Old Joseon that existed prior to Dangun Joseon, or Shinshi of Hwan-ung. It is desirable to clearly distinguish Shinshi Era of Hwan-ung as "Old Joseon" from later Joseon of Dangun.

목차

1. 사료와 사관의 변증법적 인식
2. 고조선 사료의 해석학적 지평융합과 지평확대
3. ‘고조선’조 사료 읽기와 교차 해석
4. 국호 ‘조선’과 시대명 ‘고조선’의 인식
5. 고조선의 실체로서 ‘신시고국’의 재인식
6. 고조선의 시공간적 실체와 해석의 지평확대
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002649175