지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 고조선단군학회 고조선단군학 고조선단군학 제30호
- 발행연도
- 2014.6
- 수록면
- 151 - 181 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.18706/jgds.2014.06.30.151
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, place names of Ancient Choson have not been indicated positively on the maps in Korean history textbooks. It is deeply related with the domain ruled by Ancient Choson. But, during the periods of the Korean Empire, the U.S Military Government, and the first and second curricular revision, the Korean history textbooks had indicated the place names of Ancient Choson on the maps. The territory of Ancient Choson is considered in close connection with the location of four counties that were established by the emperor Wudi Han empire(漢武帝) after conquerring Ancient Choson. So, scholars of Korean history have shown conflicting views on the locations of four Han counties(漢四郡), and I"m sure that it is a very sensitive issue in relation to East Asian history. It is not only beyond deplorable but worring that rather than because of foreign relations, differences of theories of domestic scholars have caused such circum stances.
We all, although, are nationalists from the bottom of our heart, in reality, the narration on the territory of Ancient Choson has grown more ambiguous. Although, on the grounds for their differences of theories, many scholars have criticized that Lee Byung-do and Shin Seok-ho indicated locations of four Han counties on maps in Korean history textbooks, until now, no one showed new, groundbreaking results on the indication of locations. In this point, 2012 revised HistoryⅠ textbook that was published by Jihak-sa is so meaningful. I think that it is more practical to reflect once more on what we should teach students than wasteful slanders and disputes.
We all, although, are nationalists from the bottom of our heart, in reality, the narration on the territory of Ancient Choson has grown more ambiguous. Although, on the grounds for their differences of theories, many scholars have criticized that Lee Byung-do and Shin Seok-ho indicated locations of four Han counties on maps in Korean history textbooks, until now, no one showed new, groundbreaking results on the indication of locations. In this point, 2012 revised HistoryⅠ textbook that was published by Jihak-sa is so meaningful. I think that it is more practical to reflect once more on what we should teach students than wasteful slanders and disputes.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 교과서 서술 내용
Ⅳ. 교과서에 나타난 고조선의 지명 및 영역관련 지도들
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002833612