지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In September 1598, when the Japanese invasion drew to its end and a cease fire negotiation began, Ding Yingtai(丁應泰), zanhuazhushi(贊畵主事) of Ming China, brought a charge against Choson to the emperor on the basis of the content" of Haedong chegukki(Records of Countries to the East 海東諸國記) which had been written 130 years before. Ding insisted that Choson hide its relations with Japan and consequently defy the emperor's dignity. This happening brought the unprecedented tension between Choson and Ming China.
Dings charge could be fatal to Choson because Choson had been under the Ming tribute system and that Ming sent heavy reinforcements at the request of the king of Choson(Sunjo 宣祖). Besides, the old suspicion of the Ming court that Choson might conspire with Japan against Ming would get more convincing proof if Dings insistence based on Haedong chegukki proves to be true.
Choson's reaction was a bold one, By suspending management of political affairs, Sunjo strongly denied the charge of treason and expressed his objection to peace negotiations, Moreover, he sent jinjusa(陳奏使) for persuading the Ming court that Choson had never lied but only performed a good neighbor(交隣) policy, I believe that the hidden purpose of those reactions consisted in grasping the detached Ming generals' view of cease fire and in demonstrating Choson's position of anti-negotiation with Japan dearly. After a long debate, the Ming court concluded that Dings insistence lacked in its evidence and Choson cleared herself of the charge.
After these happenings, the Ming court took its stand of a nonintervention policy as far as Choson-Japan relations remained unharmful. Though Choson still had to be conscious of Ming China on relations with Japan, Choson tried to use the policy for taking the diplomatic initiative between Ming China and Japan, The Choson court not only tried to remind Ning of Japan as a possible threat in order to prevent another invasion with the help of Ming but also Japan of Choson's relations with Ming in order to cake the initiative in negotiating with Japan. I believe, as a result, Choson could develop the independent relations with Japan from Ming China in following diplomatic activities such as Tongshjnsa(通信使).
Dings charge could be fatal to Choson because Choson had been under the Ming tribute system and that Ming sent heavy reinforcements at the request of the king of Choson(Sunjo 宣祖). Besides, the old suspicion of the Ming court that Choson might conspire with Japan against Ming would get more convincing proof if Dings insistence based on Haedong chegukki proves to be true.
Choson's reaction was a bold one, By suspending management of political affairs, Sunjo strongly denied the charge of treason and expressed his objection to peace negotiations, Moreover, he sent jinjusa(陳奏使) for persuading the Ming court that Choson had never lied but only performed a good neighbor(交隣) policy, I believe that the hidden purpose of those reactions consisted in grasping the detached Ming generals' view of cease fire and in demonstrating Choson's position of anti-negotiation with Japan dearly. After a long debate, the Ming court concluded that Dings insistence lacked in its evidence and Choson cleared herself of the charge.
After these happenings, the Ming court took its stand of a nonintervention policy as far as Choson-Japan relations remained unharmful. Though Choson still had to be conscious of Ming China on relations with Japan, Choson tried to use the policy for taking the diplomatic initiative between Ming China and Japan, The Choson court not only tried to remind Ning of Japan as a possible threat in order to prevent another invasion with the help of Ming but also Japan of Choson's relations with Ming in order to cake the initiative in negotiating with Japan. I believe, as a result, Choson could develop the independent relations with Japan from Ming China in following diplomatic activities such as Tongshjnsa(通信使).
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 정응태 조선무고사건의 배경
Ⅱ. 조선무고의 내용과 정응태의 논리
Ⅲ. 정응태의 조선무고사건에 대한 조선의 대응
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고조선 연구의 현황과 과제
고조선단군학
2003 .12
-
日帝の朝鮮支配末期における情報ㆍ宣伝政策
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
黃遵憲의 『朝鮮策略』에 나타난 朝鮮自强策과 ‘地域’의식
동양고전연구
2010 .01
-
古朝鮮과 琵琶形銅劍의 問題
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
조선 초기 명과의 사신 왕래 문제에 대한 연구와 분석
역사와 세계
2012 .12
-
고조선의 붕괴 원인
고조선단군학
2010 .11
-
고조선의 실존문제 : 상식적 탐색
고조선단군학
2011 .11
-
『三國遺事』와 『潛夫論』의 고조선 인식
고조선단군학
2010 .05
-
衛滿朝鮮의 王權과 地方統治體制
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
衛滿朝鮮의 領域과 王儉城
한국고대사연구
2001 .06
-
1937-45년 일제의 戰費調達과 朝鮮銀行卷 發行制度 전환
한국사연구
2004 .12
-
미국 학계에서의 조선성리학 연구현황
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
한말 일제강점기 민족사학자들의 위만과 위만조선 이해와 서술
역사연구
2017 .12
-
조선중화주의의 재검토 : 이론적 접근
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
朝鮮時代 賤人身分變動의 諸問題
경주사학
1996 .12
-
조선전기의 司饔院
한국사학보
1998 .03
-
Ming Chinese Initials and △
언어
1979 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0