지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Forum shopping is the informal name given to the practice adopted by some plaintiffs to get their legal case heard in the court thought most likely to provide a favourable judgment, or by some defendants who seek to have the case moved to a different court. This is an increasingly serious problem because it balances the concept of party autonomy against broader concerns of justice and fairness. Some states have become notorious as plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions and so have become litigation magnets even though there is little or no connection between the legal issues and the jurisdiction in which they are to be litigated.
The United States has attracted foreign litigants wishing to take advantage of the more generous awards of damages and alimony, the extensive discovery rules and, most importantly, the contingent fee system. Therefore, The United State Law is adopting the principle of forum non conveniens as the rule of jurisdiction against forum shopping of plaintiffs
The doctrine of forum non conveniens originated in Scotland in the nineteenth century but largely developed in United States of America. In America a court, in order to stay an action, must take into account both the private interest of parties and the public interest of the forum State.
Parties of a international transactions of letter of credit generally do business in different countries. In commercial disputes from international transactions of letter of credit, forum shopping problems has happened. In this paper, two cases of U.S. courts concerning disputes of international transactions of letter of credit were analyzed to find factors to be considered whether to grant or deny the remedy of forum non conveniens.
Most important part of whole international transaction of letter of credit is making payment to beneficiary by nominated bank. Such essential performance of letter of credit can be said to be happened in the business place of nominated bank. Disputes of international letter of credit can have most deep relations with the business place of nominated bank. Therefore, although reimbursement to nominated bank by reimbursing bank or issuing bank happens in the America, U.S. courts is to dismiss case by application of forum non conveniens if such case have no relations or a few relations with America.
The United States has attracted foreign litigants wishing to take advantage of the more generous awards of damages and alimony, the extensive discovery rules and, most importantly, the contingent fee system. Therefore, The United State Law is adopting the principle of forum non conveniens as the rule of jurisdiction against forum shopping of plaintiffs
The doctrine of forum non conveniens originated in Scotland in the nineteenth century but largely developed in United States of America. In America a court, in order to stay an action, must take into account both the private interest of parties and the public interest of the forum State.
Parties of a international transactions of letter of credit generally do business in different countries. In commercial disputes from international transactions of letter of credit, forum shopping problems has happened. In this paper, two cases of U.S. courts concerning disputes of international transactions of letter of credit were analyzed to find factors to be considered whether to grant or deny the remedy of forum non conveniens.
Most important part of whole international transaction of letter of credit is making payment to beneficiary by nominated bank. Such essential performance of letter of credit can be said to be happened in the business place of nominated bank. Disputes of international letter of credit can have most deep relations with the business place of nominated bank. Therefore, although reimbursement to nominated bank by reimbursing bank or issuing bank happens in the America, U.S. courts is to dismiss case by application of forum non conveniens if such case have no relations or a few relations with America.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국법의 Forum Non Conveniens 법리
Ⅲ. 국제신용장분생소송에서 Forum Non Conveniens 법리의 적용에 관한 판례
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
FORUM
벤처다이제스트
2003 .01
-
부적절한 법정지의 법리(Forum Non Conveniens) 도입 효과에 관한 연구 : 기업 보호 효과를 중심으로
강원법학
2013 .02
-
신용장의 개설 관련 제 문제에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2010 .05
-
Determinants of Forum Non Conveniens on International Contract Negotiation : U.S. Court's Judicial Precedent
중재연구
2008 .01
-
글로벌 전자무역의 활성화를 위한 전자신용장 제도의 운용과 개선방향
무역학회지
2008 .02
-
국제거래에서 법정지선택 조항의 효력에 관한 고찰 : 미국과 한국의 판례비교를 중심으로
법학연구
2011 .04
-
신용장의 취소 및 조건변경에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2011 .05
-
Korea-U.S. Science and Technology Cooperation Forum 2
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1994 .11
-
보증신용장거래에서 지급청구의 문제점에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2011 .01
-
신용장의 국제표준은행관행에 관한 한 ·중간 비교연구
무역연구
2019 .01
-
Korean Court as a Forum for the Maritime Cases : Status and Prospects
국제사법연구
2016 .12
-
UCP 600하에서 신용장 매입은행의 법적 지위에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2010 .11
-
신용장의 비서류적 조건의 유효성
무역상무연구
2004 .02
-
제3자명의 신용장거래의 법률관계와 발행은행의 대응방안에 관한 연구
무역연구
2011 .01
-
Comments on the Fifth Jurisdiction under the Montreal Convention 1999
한국항공우주정책·법학회지
2009 .01
-
클러스터 내 학습을 기반한 포럼네트워크의 암묵지 특성에 관한 연구 : 과학단지 내 사회네트워크 분석
지역사회연구
2012 .06
-
國際裁判管轄 決定의 一般的 基準으로서 實質的 關聯의 原則 : 韓國法院의 判例를 中心으로
국제사법연구
2012 .12
-
신용장거래에서 은행의 하자통지의무에 관한 사례연구
경영법률
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002862751