지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
When drafting an arbitration clause, both contracting parties should be careful of inserting three factors in the clause ; the seat of arbitration, the institution of arbitration(if institutional arbitration) and the governing arbitration law.
Among them, this author, focusing on the institutions, selected the most important and frequently recommended three institutions(ICC, LCIA and AAA) and examined the salient differences among their rules as follows ;
First, ICC Rules, unlike the LCIA Rules and AAA International Rules, provide for scrutiny by the ICC Court of Arbitration of all awards before issuance, and they also require the parties and arbitrators to draft and to sign Terms of Reference at the outset of each case.
Second, Regarding the institutional role in arbitrator appointment, even if the LCIA and AAA are also internationally-minded in their appointment practice, the ICC, with national committees throughout the world, has a widely dispersed network of information about candidates, and has extensive experienced arbitrators suitable for international disputes.
Third, regarding the case administrators, the ICC has multi-lingual international lawyers, who may help the parties in communication and in the interpretations of the arbitration rules. These efficient administrators help the parties saving the expenses and time.
Forth, Certain institutions like ICC, LCIA and AAA have developed good reputation over years. Expecially, the ICC, unlike other institutions, scrutinizes awards for formal completeness and adherence to its Rules, so the court would accord the awards rendered by the ICC.
Fifth, the arbitration costs(including administrative costs and arbitrators fees) are usually decided by the arbitral tribunal, and its decision is reflected in the award. But both parties, according to the principles of the freedom of contract, may agree the allotment in advance.
This paper introduces the model clauses, reflecting several types of allotment, which would be added to the arbitration clauses with the agreement between parties.
Finally, this paper emphasized the importance of the choice of institution in relation to the choice of the seat of arbitration. Expecially for the disputes about intellectual property right or domain names, WIPO and ICANN are recommendable respectively, as the confidentiality should be kept.
Therefore, when both parties choose the institution they should be kept in mind the above mentioned points for the fair award and its enforcement.
Among them, this author, focusing on the institutions, selected the most important and frequently recommended three institutions(ICC, LCIA and AAA) and examined the salient differences among their rules as follows ;
First, ICC Rules, unlike the LCIA Rules and AAA International Rules, provide for scrutiny by the ICC Court of Arbitration of all awards before issuance, and they also require the parties and arbitrators to draft and to sign Terms of Reference at the outset of each case.
Second, Regarding the institutional role in arbitrator appointment, even if the LCIA and AAA are also internationally-minded in their appointment practice, the ICC, with national committees throughout the world, has a widely dispersed network of information about candidates, and has extensive experienced arbitrators suitable for international disputes.
Third, regarding the case administrators, the ICC has multi-lingual international lawyers, who may help the parties in communication and in the interpretations of the arbitration rules. These efficient administrators help the parties saving the expenses and time.
Forth, Certain institutions like ICC, LCIA and AAA have developed good reputation over years. Expecially, the ICC, unlike other institutions, scrutinizes awards for formal completeness and adherence to its Rules, so the court would accord the awards rendered by the ICC.
Fifth, the arbitration costs(including administrative costs and arbitrators fees) are usually decided by the arbitral tribunal, and its decision is reflected in the award. But both parties, according to the principles of the freedom of contract, may agree the allotment in advance.
This paper introduces the model clauses, reflecting several types of allotment, which would be added to the arbitration clauses with the agreement between parties.
Finally, this paper emphasized the importance of the choice of institution in relation to the choice of the seat of arbitration. Expecially for the disputes about intellectual property right or domain names, WIPO and ICANN are recommendable respectively, as the confidentiality should be kept.
Therefore, when both parties choose the institution they should be kept in mind the above mentioned points for the fair award and its enforcement.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 3大 仲裁機關의 설립 및 중재규칙
Ⅲ. 당사자의 중재기관 선택시 고려사항
Ⅳ. 結論
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
ICC중재의 주요특징과 KCAB중재의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .02
-
Considerations in the Choice of the Seat of Arbitration When Drafting Arbitration Clause in International Commercial Contract
무역상무연구
2005 .12
-
국제상사중재에서 중재인 선정에 관한 비교연구 : 국제중재규칙을 중심으로
통상정보연구
2006 .09
-
국제상업회의소(ICC) 중재규칙의 2012년 개정내용에 관한 검토
무역상무연구
2012 .08
-
2019년 개정 ICC 중재 진행에 관한 당사자 및 중재판정부 지침의 주요내용과 시사점:ICC의 중재판정부 정보 공개 및 중재판정의발간 정책을 중심으로
중재연구
2019 .01
-
國際商事契約에서 仲裁條項(Arbitration Clauses)의 主要要素와 實例
무역학회지
2005 .10
-
國際商事契約에서 仲裁條項 삽입시 중재기관 선택에 따른 고려사항
무역상무연구
2012 .08
-
ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 역할이 KCAB 국제중재규칙에 주는 시사점 : 사무국, 중재판정부, 국제중재위원회의 업무분장을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2008 .08
-
중재합의시 중재지 결정에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .12
-
대한상사중재원 국제중재규칙의 개정 동향- ICC 중재규칙의 개정과 비교하여 -
중재연구
2012 .01
-
기관중재와 임시중재에 관한 비교연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
The ICC Scrutiny Process and Enhanced Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
중재연구
2014 .01
-
국제투자계약상의 중재조항(Arbitration Clause)의 주요 구성요소에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2008 .05
-
ICC 중재규칙(ICC Rules of Arbitration)의 “위탁조건”(Terms of Reference)에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2006 .08
-
주요 외국중재기관의 규칙 개정 현황에 대한 고찰
무역상무연구
2014 .12
-
ICC 국제중재법원과 대한상사중재원의 체제와 실태에 관한 실증적 연구
무역학회지
2000 .12
-
국제상사중재에서 중재판정부의 임시적 보전처분에 관한 연구 : AAA/ICDR을 중심으로
무역학회지
2008 .06
-
ICC 중재에서 중재법원의 제3중재인 선정에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2008 .02
-
중재에 있어서 법원의 역할
무역상무연구
2006 .05
-
ICC중재에서 중재비용의 결정과 할당에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2007 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002851372