메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오원석 (성균관대학교) 송수련 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第36卷 第3號
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
201 - 219 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to find out about some countermeasure to Korean companies entered Chinese market through analyzing arbitration cases resolved by CIETAC(China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission) and application of CISG among the CIETAC arbitration cases.
According to "Collection of the CIETAC’s cases(《中??????易仲裁裁????》), Korean companies won just 1 case among 5 cases which is the lowest ration of winning cases. In one case, Korean seller lost the case owing to choice of contracted buyer even its claim was due right. In another case, Korean companies lost both cases, because CIETAC rendered different awards for the same issue. CIETAC has applied CISG to the cases actively to improve fairness of awards, and consequently this ratio is much higher than U.S.A. and Korea. This ratio is also expected to increase steadily, because Korea and Japan which are important trade partners became the contracting state for CISG recently.
Korean companies usually prefer trial to arbitration to settle a dispute, but arbitration is much efficient in China. There are not only arbitrators already reached significant level based on political support, but some Korean arbitrators also registered as Registered Arbitrator in CIETAC. Therefore, training and promotion for Chinese arbitration and CISG are fulfilled urgently to Korean companies.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. CIETAC의 중재사건 현황
Ⅲ. CIETAC의 국가별 현황
Ⅳ. CIETAC 중재상 CISG의 적용현황
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-326-000658262